首页> 外文期刊>Building >Too much to ask for?
【24h】

Too much to ask for?

机译:要求太多了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This one is for all you architects to read. Oh, and maybe all you other fee earners who charge by the hour. Some of you are pretty loose about keeping timesheets and can easily come a cropper. Architect Munkenbeck ft Marshall did. The firm provided architectural services for one Michael Harold, who owned a central London property. The professional fee was 9.5% of final building cost. The form of contract was the everyday RIBA SFA/99. Architect and client fell out. The last £54,000 of the fee was held back. But before the trial, the matter was resolved by agreement. Mr Harold paid up and dropped his counterclaim.
机译:这是供您的所有架构师阅读的。哦,也许还有您按小时收费的所有其他收费人员。你们中的一些人对于保留时间表非常宽松,可以轻松地收获。建筑师Munkenbeck和Marshall做到了。该公司为拥有伦敦市中心物业的迈克尔·哈罗德(Michael Harold)提供了建筑服务。专业费用为最终建筑成本的9.5%。合同的形式是每天的RIBA SFA / 99。建筑师和客户摔倒了。费用的最后54,000英镑被保留。但在审判之前,此事已通过协议解决。哈罗德先生付清了钱,放弃了反诉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2005年第8383期|p.48|共1页
  • 作者

    Tony Bingham;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:39:18
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号