Several years ago on these pages a leading construction barrister, now a High Court judge, strongly criticised the RIBA's standard form for the appointment of an architect (SFA/99). It was, he said, unfairly weighted against the client (Robert Akenhead. Some of the criticisms were echoed by the High Court in a 2005 case, Munkenbeck and Marshall vs Harold, which described two of the terms as "unfair and onerous". The RIBA has recently updated the contract as the RIBA Standard Agreement 2007 S-Con-07. Is this one any better?
展开▼
机译：几年前，在这些页面上，一位领先的建筑大律师（现为高等法院法官）强烈批评了RIBA任命建筑师的标准表格（SFA / 99）。他说，这是对客户的不公平对待（罗伯特·阿肯黑德。高等法院在2005年的一案中回应了一些批评，Munkenbeck和Marshall诉Harold一案，其中两个词称“不公平和繁重”。 RIBA最近将合同更新为RIBA Standard Agreement 2007 S-Con-07，这是否更好？
展开▼
