首页> 外文期刊>Building >NO ESCAPE FROM 106
【24h】

NO ESCAPE FROM 106

机译:从106起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Court of Appeal has issued a decision reinforcing the position that parties will, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, be held to the commitments they have made in a planning obligation (a bilateral section 106 agreement or unilateral undertaking). Section 106 obligations are a prominent piece of the development puzzle. Developers are required to enter into them to mitigate the impact of the proposed development so that it is "sustainable" in line with the government's aim for the planning system. Obligations range from sustainability measures to payments for the provision of additional school places to the construction of large pieces of infrastructure such as roads. Developers are often forced to accept unreasonable demands of local authorities in order to secure a planning permission, and many take the view that they may be able to escape these obligations further down the line. However, case law is very clear that parties will be held to their bargains when they enter into such obligations.
机译:上诉法院发布了一项决定,加强了以下立场:当事方在没有特殊情况的情况下,将履行其在计划义务(双边第106条协议或单方面承诺)中所作的承诺。第106条规定的义务是发展难题中的重要部分。要求开发商参与其中,以减轻拟议开发项目的影响,使其“可持续”发展,以符合政府对规划系统的目标。义务的范围从可持续性措施到支付额外的学校名额到建造大型基础设施(如道路)。为了确保获得规划许可,开发商经常被迫接受地方当局的不合理要求,许多开发商认为,他们有可能能够进一步摆脱这些义务。但是,判例法非常清楚地表明,当当事方承担此类义务时,将被讨价还价。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2014年第26期|40-41|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:33:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号