首页> 外文期刊>Building >ABSENT FRIENDS
【24h】

ABSENT FRIENDS

机译:缺席朋友

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The number of cases regarding the amended Construction Act has been increasing lately. We now have our first decision on the provisions intended to clarify when an employer can avoid having to pay a previously certified sum to a contractor who has become insolvent. I think it is fair to say that it goes wider than most commentators thought. These provisions are important, as contractor insolvency is still an all too frequent occurrence. Naturally, employers have no wish to make payments to an insolvent contractor without being able to take into account any cross claims resulting from the insolvency. To do otherwise would doubtless see money flushed away. To recap, section 111(10) of the act provides that as long as the contract is drafted appropriately, an employer is not obliged to pay a certified sum if the contractor becomes insolvent after the last date a valid payless notice could be served. Instead, there will be a final account between the parties taking into account their respective claims.
机译:有关经修订的《建筑法》的案件数量最近有所增加。现在,我们对有关规定的第一个决定是第一个决定,该规定旨在阐明何时雇主可以避免必须向破产的承包商支付先前认证的金额。我认为可以说它超出了大多数评论员的想法。这些规定很重要,因为承包商破产仍然很常见。当然,雇主不愿向破产承包商付款,而无须考虑破产造成的任何交叉索赔。否则,无疑会看到钱被冲走。综上所述,该法令第111条第10款规定,只要合同起草得当,如果承包商在最后日期后可以提供有效的无偿通知书而破产,则雇主无义务支付证明金额。取而代之的是,当事双方之间将考虑其各自的要求而做出最终决定。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2015年第45期|40-41|共2页
  • 作者

    Steven Carey;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:33:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号