首页> 外文期刊>Building Services Engineering Research & Technology >Performance comparison of temperature and humidity independent control air-conditioning system with conventional system
【24h】

Performance comparison of temperature and humidity independent control air-conditioning system with conventional system

机译:温湿度独立控制空调系统与常规系统的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The energy consumption of centralized air-conditioning systems represents a large percentage of total building energy consumption in commercial buildings. The temperature and humidity independent control system, regulating indoor temperature and humidity separately through different approaches, is a feasible improvement to conventional systems. This paper focuses on the performance discrepancies between the temperature and humidity independent control systems and the conventional systems. A typical office building in Guangzhou is chosen for case study and energy performances of three temperature and humidity independent control systems with different outdoor air handling processes are investigated. Compared to the conventional system, energy efficiency ratio for the entire air-conditioning season of temperature and humidity independent control system I using condensing dehumidification is about 10% higher if the dry fan coil unit is adopted; of temperature and humidity independent control system II with high-temperature chilled water for precooling is about 16% higher, and energy efficiency improvement of temperature and humidity independent control system III with heat pump driven liquid desiccant air handling processor is about 22%. For other three cities in China, the energy saving ratio of temperature and humidity independent control system I is about 10%, about 15%-17% of temperature and humidity independent control system II and 20%-23% of temperature and humidity independent control system III.Practical application: THIC air-conditioning system is supposed to be an effective approach for energy saving in buildings. Chosen a typical office building as an example, this paper gives the energy performance discrepancies between the conventional system and the THIC systems for researchers and designers. Annual energy consumptions for different air-conditioning systems are compared, and the energy saving ratios of THIC systems are obtained. The research will be helpful for designing and constructing an energy efficient central air-conditioning system for buildings. In these typical cities or cities with similar climate, THIC system III with the highest energy efficiency is recommended just from the perspective of energy saving.
机译:中央空调系统的能耗在商业建筑中占建筑总能耗的很大比例。独立于温度和湿度的控制系统,通过不同的方法分别调节室内的温度和湿度,是对常规系统的可行改进。本文着重于温度和湿度独立控制系统与常规系统之间的性能差异。选择广州的一栋典型办公楼进行案例研究,并研究了三种具有不同室外空气处理过程的温度和湿度独立控制系统的能源性能。与常规系统相比,如果采用干式风机盘管单元,则采用冷凝除湿的温湿度独立控制系统I在整个空调季节的能效比要高出约10%。具有用于预冷的高温冷水的温湿度独立控制系统II的成本约高16%,而具有热泵驱动的液体干燥剂空气处理处理器的温湿度独立控制系统III的能源效率提高约22%。对于中国其他三个城市,温湿度独立控制系统I的节能率约为10%,温湿度独立控制系统II的节能率约为15%-17%,温湿度独立控制系统的节能率约为20%-23%。系统III。实际应用:THIC空调系统被认为是建筑物节能的有效方法。本文以一幢典型的办公楼为例,为研究人员和设计人员提供了常规系统和THIC系统在能源性能上的差异。比较了不同空调系统的年能耗,并得出了THIC系统的节能率。该研究将有助于设计和构建建筑物的节能中央空调系统。在这些典型的城市或气候相似的城市中,仅从节能角度考虑,建议使用能效最高的THIC III。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号