首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >FPM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD V BLUE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL
【24h】

FPM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD V BLUE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL

机译:FPM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD V蓝山理事会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Council of the City of the Blue Mountains entered into a building contract (AS 4300) with Fyntray Constructions Pty Ltd on 17 October 2001 for the design and construction of the Lower Blue Mountains Aquatic Centre. The contract was later assigned, so that FPM Constructions Pty Ltd (the plaintiff) became the contractor. The contract was a lump sum contract which contained no schedule of rates by reference to which the value or price attributable to particular parts of the work could be ascertained. Clause 42 provides a mechanism for a contractor to deliver to the superintendent a "claim for payments supported by evidence of the amount due to the contractor and on such information as the Superintendent may reasonably require. Claims for payment shall include the value of work carried out by the Contractor in the performance of the Contract to that time, together with all amounts then otherwise due to the Contractor arising out of the Contract." Clause 42.1 provides that "Within 14 days of receipt of a claim for payment, the Superintendent shall assess the claim and shall issue to the Principal and to the Contractor a payment certificate stating the amount of the payment which, in the Superintendent's opinion, is to be made by the Principal to the Contractor or by the Contractor to the Principal. The Superintendent shall set out in the certificate the calculations employed to arrive at the amount, and if the amount is more or less than the amount claimed by the Contractor, the reasons for the difference. The Superintendent shall also set out, as applicable, in any payment certificate issued pursuant to clause 42, the allowances made for (inter alia) the value of work carried out by the Contractor in the performance of the Contract to the date of the claim."
机译:蓝山市议会于2001年10月17日与Fyntray Constructions Pty Ltd签订了建筑合同(AS 4300),以设计和建造蓝山下水道中心。后来分配了合同,因此FPM Constructions Pty Ltd(原告)成为承包商。该合同是一笔总价合同,其中不包含任何费率表,无法参考这些费率表确定属于工作特定部分的价值或价格。第42条提供了一种机制,使承包商可以向总监交付“索偿要求,并附有应付给承包商的款项的证据,并应由总监合理地要求提供此类信息。索偿要求应包括所完成工程的价值由承包商在当时履行合同时,连同当时应由承包商从合同中产生的所有款项。”第42.1条规定:“在收到付款请求后14天内,主管应评估该请求,并应向委托人和承包商签发付款证书,其中应说明主管认为是主管应在证书中列出为得出该金额所使用的计算方法,如果该金额大于或小于承包商所要求的金额,则主管应在证书中列出该金额。主管还应在适用的情况下,在根据第42条签发的任何付款证书中,为承包商(尤其是)为履行合同对承包商履行的工作的价值而提供的津贴。索赔日期。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号