首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >QUEENSLAND v WALTER CONSTRUCTION GROUP
【24h】

QUEENSLAND v WALTER CONSTRUCTION GROUP

机译:昆士兰v沃尔特建筑集团

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This was a challenge to charges for payment of money payable, claimed under the Subcontractors' Charges Act 1974 (Qld) by a number of subcontractors of Walter Construction Group Ltd, which was in liquidation. The charges related to the Mt Lindesay Highway duplication project. The subcontractors had not commenced proceedings within one month of claiming charges as required by s 15 of the Subcontractors' Charges Act, after which time the charge is extinguished. The subcontractors, however, argued on two bases that they were still entitled to commence proceedings in relation to the charges, namely: (a) that the time for commencing proceedings was suspended while the contractor was in administration, pursuant to s 451D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and (b) that the subcontractors should be deemed to have commenced proceedings when other subcontractors commenced proceedings within one month of the first subcontractors' notice of claim being issued, pursuant to s 12 of the Subcontractors' Charges Act.
机译:这是对应付款项的收费提出的挑战,沃尔特建筑集团有限公司的许多分包商根据《 1974年分包商收费法》(Quld)要求对这些款项进行清算。这些费用与林德赛山高速公路复制项目有关。分包商在《分包商收费法》第15条所要求的指控提出请求的一个月内未提起诉讼,此后该指控被撤销。但是,分包商基于两个理由辩称,他们仍有权就有关指控进行诉讼,即:(a)根据公司第451D条的规定,在承包商处于管理状态时,暂停诉讼的时间2001年法案(联邦); (b)根据《分包商收费法》第12条,当其他分包商在第一份分包商发出索赔通知后的一个月内开始提起诉讼时,应认为该分包商已开始提起诉讼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号