首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >Variation claims in the absence of required writing
【24h】

Variation claims in the absence of required writing

机译:没有书面要求的变更要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Almost all construction contracts require that, if a variation of the works is ordered, such an order will be in writing. Often variations are ordered in circumstances where the instruction to carry out a variation by, for example, the superintendent, is not given in writing. In such a case, is the contractor enabled to recover its entitlement under the terms of the contract or must it rely on an action in quantum meruit or is there no entitlement whatsoever? That is to say, is the requirement of writing a matter of procedure or is it mandatory?
机译:几乎所有的建筑合同都要求,如果订购了工程的变体,则必须以书面形式进行。在没有书面指示的情况下,通常会下令进行更改,例如,由总监进行更改的指令。在这种情况下,承包商是否有能力根据合同条款收回其权利,还是必须依靠一项量子价值诉讼或是否没有任何权利?也就是说,写的要求是程序问题还是强制性的?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号