首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >ROBINSON v 470 ST KILDA ROAD PTY LTD
【24h】

ROBINSON v 470 ST KILDA ROAD PTY LTD

机译:罗宾逊v 470 ST KILDA ROAD PTY LTD

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In October 2010, Reed Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (Reed), as contractor, entered into a design and construct contract with 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd (St Kilda Road), as principal, for the redevelopment of a building in Melbourne. The contract provided for Reed to make payment claims on the 28th day of each month for "work under the contract" (WUC) undertaken in that month. The parties adopted a practice which involved Reed providing the payment claim to St Kilda Road, together with a statutory declaration as to the payment of Reed's subcontractors and suppliers. Clause 38.1 of the contract relevantly provided: If requested by the Principal or the Principal's Representative, the Contractor shall give in respect of a payment claim, documentary evidence of the payment of moneys due and payable to: (a) workers of the Contractor and of the subcontractors; and (b) subcontractors, in respect of WUC the subject of that payment claim.
机译:2010年10月,作为承包商的里德建筑澳大利亚有限公司(Reed)与主体470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd(St Kilda Road)签订了设计和建造合同,以重新开发墨尔本的建筑物。合同规定,里德在每月28日就该月进行的“合同下的工作”(WUC)提出付款要求。订约方采用一种惯例,其中涉及Reed向St Kilda Road提供付款要求,以及关于Reed分包商和供应商付款的法定声明。相关规定的合同第38.1条:如果委托人或委托人的代表要求,承包商应就付款要求提供应付款的书面证明,以支付给:(a)承包商的工人和分包商; (b)分包商,就WUC而言,该付款请求的主题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and construction law》 |2019年第2期|134-161|共28页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:52:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号