首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4
【24h】

Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4

机译:1990-4年牛津地区基金持有和非基金持有实务推荐模式的趋势前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective—To compare outpatient referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices before and after the NHS reforms in April 1991. Design—Prospective collection of data on general practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics between June 1990 and January 1994 and detailed comparisons of three phases—October 1990 to March 1991 (phase 1), October 1991 to March 1992 (phase 2), and October 1993 to January 1994 (phase 3). Setting—10 first wave fundholding practices and six non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region. Subjects—Patients referred to consultant outpatient clinics. Results—NHS referral rates increased in fund-holding practices in phase 2 and phase 3 of the study by 8.1/1000 patients a year (95% confidence interval 5.7 to 10.5), an increase of 7.5% from phase 1 (107.3/1000) to phase 3 (115.4/1000). Non-fund-holders' rates increased significantly, by 25.3/1000 patients (22.5-28.1), an increase of 26.6% from phase 1 (95.0/1000) to phase 3 (120.3/1000). The fund-holders' referral rates to private clinics decreased by 8.8%, whereas those from non-fundholding practices increased by 12.2%. The proportion of referrals going outside district boundaries did not change significantly. Three of the four practices entering the third and fourth wave of fundholding increased their referral rates significantly in the year before becoming fundholders. Conclusions—No evidence existed that budgetary pressures caused first wave fundholders to reduce referral rates, although the method of budget allocation may have encouraged general practitioners to inflate their referral rates in the preparatory year. Despite investment in new practice based facilities, no evidence yet exists that fundholding encourages a shift away from specialist care.
机译:目的-比较1991年4月NHS改革前后在资金持有和非资金持有实践中的门诊转诊模式。设计-前瞻性收集1990年6月至1994年1月全科医生转诊至专科门诊的数据,并对三者进行详细比较阶段-1990年10月至1991年3月(阶段1),1991年10月至1992年3月(阶段2)以及1993年10月至1994年1月(阶段3)。设置-牛津地区的10个第一波资金持有业务和6个非资金持有业务。受试者-患者转诊到顾问门诊诊所。结果-在研究的第2阶段和第3阶段,NHS推荐率每年增加8.1 / 1000个患者(95%置信区间5.7至10.5),比第1阶段(107.3 / 1000)增加7.5%进入阶段3(115.4 / 1000)。非基金持有人的比率显着提高,增加了25.3 / 1000位患者(22.5-28.1),从第一阶段(95.0 / 1000)到第三阶段(120.3 / 1000)增加了26.6%。基金持有人转诊至私人诊所的比率下降了8.8%,而非基金持有人的转诊比率上升了12.2%。转出区域边界的引荐比例没有明显变化。进入第三次和第四次持股浪潮的四种做法中,有三种在成为基金持有人之前的一年中大大提高了推荐率。结论—尽管预算分配方法可能鼓励全科医生在准备年度提高其推荐率,但没有证据表明预算压力会导致第一波资金持有人降低推荐率。尽管对基于新实践的设施进行了投资,但尚无证据表明资金持有会鼓励从专科医疗转向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号