首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Commentary: Understanding it all—health, meta-theories, and mortality trends
【24h】

Commentary: Understanding it all—health, meta-theories, and mortality trends

机译:评论:全面了解健康,元理论和死亡率趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Investigations into the determinants of health within and between countries contribute to a generally slow, but incremental process. Leaping forward to the big picture of how it all fits together represents an attractive alternative to merely continuing with this laborious spadework. Bunker and colleagues advance the idea of bounded freedom as being the key to health and well-being, a viewpoint which shares some characteristics with others who consider embeddeness within strong social networks as being the important determinant of population health. The positive benefits of strong social ties seem self evident, but "the plausible role of biological pathways leading from social disconnection to disease" that Bunker and colleagues evoke has not been satisfactorily elucidated. Indeed, degree of social support may be influenced by health rather than the reverse. The supposedly protective influence of social support has been shown among the majority populations of the United States, United Kingdom, and Scandinavia, but in groups that have different connotations for such networks social ties can appear detrimental, rather than beneficial, to health.
机译:对国家内部和国家之间的健康决定因素的调查有助于总体上缓慢但渐进的过程。向前迈进,了解如何将它们组合在一起,这是一个有吸引力的选择,而不是仅继续进行此繁琐的工作。邦克(Bunker)和同事提出了将有限制的自由作为健康和福祉的关键的观点,这种观点与其他人一样具有某些特征,而其他人则认为在强大的社交网络中嵌入信息是人口健康的重要决定因素。牢固的社会纽带的积极好处似乎不言而喻,但邦克尔及其同事所唤起的“从社会分离到疾病的生物学途径的合理作用”尚未得到令人满意的阐明。确实,社会支持的程度可能受到健康的影响,而不是相反。在美国,英国和斯堪的纳维亚半岛的大多数人口中已经显示出社会支持的所谓的保护性影响,但是在对此类网络具有不同含义的人群中,社会联系可能对健康不利,而不是有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号