首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >The truth about doctors' handwriting: a prospective study
【24h】

The truth about doctors' handwriting: a prospective study

机译:关于医生笔迹的真相:一项前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective—To determine whether doctors have worse handwriting than other health professionals. Design—Comparison of handwriting samples collected prospectively in a standardised 10 seconds' task. Setting—Courses on quality improvement. Subjects—209 health care professionals attending the courses, including 82 doctors. Main outcome measures—Legibility rated on a four-point scale by four raters. Results—The handwriting of doctors was no less legible than that of non-doctors. Significantly lower legibility than average was associated with being an executive and being male. Overall legibility scores were normally distributed, with median legibility equivalent to a rating between "fair" and "good." Conclusion—This study fails to support the conventional wisdom that doctors' handwriting is worse than others'. Illegible writing is, however, an important cause of waste and hazard in medical care, but efforts to improve the safety and efficiency of written communication must approach the problem systemically—and assume that the problems are in inherent in average human writing—rather than treating doctors as if they were a special subpopulation.
机译:目的—确定医生的笔迹是否比其他卫生专业人员差。设计-比较在10秒钟的标准化任务中预期收集的笔迹样本。设置-课程以提高质量。主题-参加课程的209位医疗保健专业人员,包括82位医生。主要结果度量-由四位评估者以四分制对可乐度进行评分。结果-医生的笔迹与非医生的笔迹一样清晰。高管人员和男性的可读性明显低于平均水平。总体可读性得分呈正态分布,中位数的可读性相当于“公平”和“良好”之间的等级。结论:该研究未能支持医生的笔迹比其他人的笔迹差的传统观念。但是,书写不清晰是造成医疗浪费和危害的重要原因,但为提高书面交流的安全性和效率而做出的努力必须系统地解决该问题,并假设这些问题是普通人类书写所固有的,而不是治疗医生好像他们是一个特殊的亚群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号