首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Inappropriate treatment for dysentery
【24h】

Inappropriate treatment for dysentery

机译:痢疾治疗不当

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Keeping abreast of changing patterns of microbial resistance presents a formidable challenge to all those prescribing antibiotics. When national standards are developed for treating infectious diseases, recommendations must be transmitted to local practitioners and drug sellers. Even if there is an effective communications network this process takes time. Given that many recommended treatments are based on outdated texts or "common practices," it is perhaps not surprising that practice changes slowly, if at all. Common practices can often be traced to the influence of one or two influential physicians whose ideas have had a disproportionate effect on the literature. For example, the overuse of metronidazole and furazolidone to treat shigella infections in Bangladesh (and many other countries) almost certainly reflects overdiagnosis of amoebiasis that 25 years ago was mistakenly considered to be the commonest cause of bloody diarrhoea.
机译:与所有微生物耐药模式的变化保持同步对所有处方抗生素的人提出了严峻的挑战。制定治疗传染病的国家标准时,必须将建议传达给当地从业人员和药品销售商。即使有有效的通信网络,此过程也需要时间。鉴于许多推荐的处理方法都是基于过时的文本或“常见做法”,因此,如果有的话,慢慢地改变实践也许就不足为奇了。常见的做法通常可以追溯到一位或两位有影响力的医生的影响,他们的想法对文献产生了不成比例的影响。例如,在孟加拉国(和许多其他国家)过度使用甲硝唑和呋喃唑酮治疗志贺氏菌感染几乎可以肯定反映了对阿米巴病的过度诊断,25年前,阿米巴病被误认为是引起腹泻的最常见原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号