首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >A quantitative systematic review of ondansetron in treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting
【24h】

A quantitative systematic review of ondansetron in treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting

机译:恩丹西酮治疗既定的术后恶心和呕吐的定量系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To test the evidence for a dose-response with ondansetron for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting and to establish whether differences in efficacy between doses are of clinical relevance. Design: Quantitative systematic review of published randomised controlled trials. Data sources: Seven trials from 1991 to January 1996 retrieved from a systematic literature search (Medline, reference lists, hand searching of anaesthetic journals, manufacturer's database); no restriction on language. Main outcome measures: Estimation of efficacy (incidence of complete control of further nausea and vomiting) by using odds ratios and the "number needed to treat" method for early (within 6 hours of administration) and late (within 24 hours) periods. Results: Four placebo controlled trials with 1043 patients studied intravenous ondansetron 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg. All doses were more efficacious than placebo in preventing further episodes of nausea or vomiting. For combined data, the point estimates for the number needed to treat were between 3.1 (8 mg) and 3.8 (1 mg) for early efficacy and between 4.1 (8 mg) and 4.8 (1 mg) for late efficacy, without significant differences between doses. No difference was found between ondansetron and droperidol in two trials with 129 patients or between ondansetron and metodopramide in one trial with 80 patients. Conclusions: Further nausea and vomiting could be prevented with ondansetron compared with placebo in 25% of patients who had nausea or vomiting (number needed to treat, about 4). There was no evidence of a clinically relevant dose-response between 1 mg and 8 mg or a difference between ondansetron and either droperidol or metoclopramide in a limited dataset A false impression of ondansetron's efficacy may arise because a quarter of all relevant published reports are duplicates, and reporting of study results is uncritical.
机译:目的:检验恩丹西酮治疗术后恶心和呕吐的剂量反应证据,并确定剂量之间疗效的差异是否具有临床意义。设计:已发表的随机对照试验的定量系统评价。数据来源:1991年至1996年1月的7项试验,来自系统的文献检索(专线,参考文献清单,麻醉学期刊的人工检索,制造商的数据库);语言不受限制。主要结果指标:使用比值比和早期(给药6小时之内)和晚期(24小时之内)的“治疗所需数量”方法,评估疗效(完全控制进一步恶心和呕吐的发生率)。结果:四个安慰剂对照试验(含1043名患者)研究了1 mg,4 mg或8 mg的恩丹西酮静脉注射。在预防进一步的恶心或呕吐发作方面,所有剂量均比安慰剂有效。对于组合数据,早期疗效的治疗点数估计值在3.1(8 mg)和3.8(1 mg)之间,晚期疗效在4.1(8 mg)和4.8(1 mg)之间,两者之间无显着差异剂量。在两项129例患者的试验中,恩丹西酮和氟哌利多之间无差异;在一项80例患者的试验中,恩丹西酮与甲氨蝶呤之间无差异。结论:与安慰剂相比,恩丹西酮可预防25%恶心或呕吐的患者(需要治疗的人数约为4),从而进一步防止恶心和呕吐。在有限的数据集中,没有证据表明临床上相关的剂量反应在1毫克至8毫克之间,或恩丹西酮与氟哌啶或甲氧氯普胺之间存在差异。对恩丹西酮功效的错误印象可能是因为所有相关发表的报告中有四分之一是重复的,研究结果的报告并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号