Authors' reply: Cost–utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210–219)

E. Wilson; K. Gurusamy; C. Gluud; B. R. Davidson

首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Surgery >Authors' reply: Cost–utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210–219)

【24h】

Authors' reply: Cost–utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210–219)

机译：作者的回复：早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本-效用和信息价值分析（Br J Surg 2010； 97：210-219）

获取原文

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

No abstract is available for this article.

机译：本文没有摘要。

著录项

来源
《British Journal of Surgery》 |2010年第7期|p.1150|共1页
作者
E. Wilson; K. Gurusamy; C. Gluud; B. R. Davidson;
展开▼
作者单位

Health Economics Group, Faculty of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK;

Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK;

Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, UK;

Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Authors' reply: Cost-utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210-219). [J] . Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, The British Journal of Surgery . 2010,第7期

机译：作者的回复：早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本效用和信息价值分析（Br J Surg 2010; 97：210-219）。
2. Cost–utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210–219) [J] . P. P. Velu, P. P. Velu British Journal of Surgery . 2010,第7期

机译：早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本-效用和信息价值分析（Br J Surg 2010; 97：210-219）
3. Commentary on Cost– utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210– 219) [J] . W. D. B. Clements British Journal of Surgery . 2010,第2期

机译：早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本效用和信息价值分析评论（Br J Surg 2010； 97：210-219）
4. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more cost-effective than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis [O] . Doa’a Kerwat, Alexander Zargaran, Reshma Bharamgoudar, 2018

机译：在急性胆囊炎的治疗中早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术比延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术更具成本效益
5. CAGS and ACS Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 41: Cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis [O] . Dixon, Elijah, Fowler, Dennis L., Ghitulescu, Gabriela 2012

机译：CAGS和ACS循证医学评论。 41：早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本-效用分析

Authors' reply: Cost–utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210–219)

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅