首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work, The >The Age of Opportunity? Revisiting Assumptions about the Life-Long Learning Opportunities of Older People Using Social Caren Services
【24h】

The Age of Opportunity? Revisiting Assumptions about the Life-Long Learning Opportunities of Older People Using Social Caren Services

机译:机会时代?关于老年人使用社会照护服务的终身学习机会的设想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shifting national policy in the UK emphasizes choice, independence and social inclusion for older people using social care services through the promotion of healthy, active lifestyles and increasing user involvement (Department of Health, 2006). Older people are a diverse population. Their definition of a ‘life worth living’ and support necessary to achieve this are cited as paramount within public policy formation. Simultaneously, older people coming into contact with social work are primarily conceptualized as ‘a challenge’ within the current social, economic and political environment, in which ageing is perceived as a time of difficulty and loss ultimately leading to increased structured dependency (Townsend, 2006). This paper makes links between discourses on life-long learning within public policy with those in social care. Both are concerned with increasing participation, citizenship and social justice for older people. It highlights contradictions between aspirations towards life-long learning derived from Freirean approaches seeking to promote ‘active ageing’ with negative political rhetoric about the burden of ageing and practice of managed care. Social workers play an important part in facilitating learning opportunities within their relationships with older people. Where and how these might be used to promote more inclusive strategies and approaches within practice for the engagement and further emancipation of service users is explored.
机译:英国不断变化的国家政策强调通过使用健康,积极的生活方式和增加用户参与,老年人使用社会护理服务的选择,独立性和社会包容性(卫生部,2006年)。老年人是多样化的人口。他们对“值得生存的生活”的定义和实现这一目标所必需的支持被认为是公共政策形成过程中的首要任务。同时,在社会,经济和政治环境下,老年人从事社会工作的主要概念是“挑战”,在这种环境下,老龄化被认为是困难和损失的时期,最终导致结构性依赖的增加(Townsend,2006年)。 )。本文将公共政策中的终身学习论述与社会护理中的论述联系起来。双方都关心增加老年人的参与,公民身份和社会正义。它突显了源自弗雷雷亚人寻求终身学习的方法之间的矛盾,这些方法旨在促进“积极老龄化”,并带有对老龄化负担和管理式照护的负面政治言论。社会工作者在与老年人的关系中促进学习机会方面发挥着重要作用。探索了在何处以及如何使用这些方法在实践中促进更具包容性的策略和方法,以吸引和进一步解放服务用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号