...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work, The >The Use of Discretion in a ‘Cinderella’ Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults
【24h】

The Use of Discretion in a ‘Cinderella’ Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults

机译:“灰姑娘”服务中的自由裁量权:成人护理后的数据保护和对儿童照护文件的访问

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of ‘street-level bureaucracy’ in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this area, via questionnaires and interviews with key actors in local authorities and voluntary organisations. The study was prompted by widespread but largely anecdotal evidence that practices and service provision for those seeking to access their care records varied enormously. While post-care adults may seek access to records for reasons similar to those of adopted adults (curiosity, information on birth family, medical information, care histories and experiences, search and reunion), there is a lack of comparable legal framework and service provision, with reliance instead on the 1998 Data Protection Act (DPA). The intersection of data protection and (child) welfare gives rise to a number of important tensions that are explored, such as those surrounding ‘ownership’ of files and their content, between rights to information and (paternalistic) welfare considerations, and whether the handling of requests should constitute an administrative or a social work task. Finally, we consider the findings, their wider contexts and implications for legal reform and policy change.
机译:本文着重于政策的实施,尤其是在福利提供的一个边缘化小区域中的“街头官僚机构”的运作,即寻求获得护理记录的护理后成年人。这项工作来自对英国在该领域提供服务的调查,并通过问卷调查和对地方当局和志愿组织中的主要行为者进行了访谈。这项研究是由广泛但大多是轶事的证据推动的,这些证据表明,为寻求访问其护理记录的人提供的做法和服务差异很大。护理后成年人可能出于与收养成年人类似的原因(好奇心,有关出生家庭的信息,医疗信息,护理历史和经历,搜寻和团聚)而寻求获得记录的机会,但缺乏可比的法律框架和服务条款,而是依靠1998年的《数据保护法》(DPA)。数据保护与(儿童)福利的交叉导致了许多重要的紧张关系,例如围绕文件及其内容的“所有权”,知情权和(家长式)福利考虑之间的紧张关系,以及是否处理的请求应构成一项行政或社会工作任务。最后,我们考虑调查结果,调查结果的广泛背景以及对法律改革和政策变更的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号