...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery >The outcome of various cements in combination with titanium reconstruction plates after segmental resection of the mandible
【24h】

The outcome of various cements in combination with titanium reconstruction plates after segmental resection of the mandible

机译:下颌骨节段切除后各种水泥结合钛重建板的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We report on 82 patients who had segmental resection of the mandible and immediate reconstruction with titanium plates, which were supplemented by polymethylmethacrylate cement (n = 32), glass ionomer cement (n = 27), silicone (n = 9), or nothing (n = 14). The mean (S.D.) follow-up time was 92 (26) months. Six months after operation, 27 (46%) of the plates with polymethylmethacrylate cement or glass ionomer cement were removed. During the same time period, four (28%) of the plates were removed in the group with no additional material and two (22%) in the group that had silicone. There was a significant difference in survival time of the metal between the group with silicone and the group with glass ionomer cement (p = 0.014, log rank). Although silicone performed slightly better than the reconstruction plate on its own, we doubt whether any cement is necessary.
机译:我们报告了82例钛合金钢板下颌骨部分切除并立即重建的患者,其中补充了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯水泥(n = 32),玻璃离聚物水泥(n = 27),硅酮(n = 9)或完全没有( n = 14)。平均(S.D.)随访时间为92(26)个月。手术六个月后,将27块(46%)带有聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯水泥或玻璃离聚物水泥的板移除。在同一时间段内,在没有其他材料的组中删除了四块(28%)的板,在有硅树脂的组中删除了两块(22%)。有硅树脂的组和有玻璃离聚物水泥的组之间,金属的生存时间有显着差异(p = 0.014,对数秩)。尽管有机硅本身的性能略好于重建板,但我们怀疑是否需要使用任何水泥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号