首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology >‘I'm a Detainee; Get Me Out of Here’
【24h】

‘I'm a Detainee; Get Me Out of Here’

机译:‘我是被拘留者;带我离开这里'

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines anew the factors that predict whether detainees in police custody request legal advice, a due process right, and whether those requests are met. It is primarily based on quantitative data collected from custody records, in one public and one privatized custody area in England and Wales, which are analysed using logistic regression. By comparing these two types of custody area, I was able to develop new insights into a neglected area of research. I conclude that privatized custody areas have unexpected consequences for procedural justice. The newer and less austere conditions may facilitate a higher proportion of requests for legal advice, which, in turn, results in higher absolute numbers of legal consultations, although a similar proportion of unmet requests. And, surprisingly, given the wider context of a more vigorous form of managerialism, this suggests that there has not been a deepening of the tendency for due process values to be trumped by crime control values.
机译:本文重新研究了预测被警方拘留的被拘留者是否要求法律咨询,正当程序权以及是否满足这些要求的因素。它主要基于从英格兰和威尔士的一个公共和一个私有保管区域的保管记录收集的定量数据,并使用逻辑回归分析。通过比较这两种类型的监护区域,我能够对被忽视的研究领域提出新的见解。我的结论是,私有化的羁押区会对程序正义产生意想不到的后果。较新的,较严格的条件可能会促进更多比例的法律咨询请求,这反过来又导致更高的绝对法律咨询数量,尽管未解决请求的比例也差不多。而且,令人惊讶的是,考虑到更强有力的管理主义形式的广泛背景,这表明,正当程序价值被犯罪控制价值所取代的趋势并未加深。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号