首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology, The >Self-Governance or Professionalized Paternalism?: The Police, Contractual Injunctions and the Differential Management of Deviant Populations
【24h】

Self-Governance or Professionalized Paternalism?: The Police, Contractual Injunctions and the Differential Management of Deviant Populations

机译:自治还是专业化的家长式统治?:警察,合同禁令和对异族的差异化管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contractual injunctions have emerged as key instruments of social control. They provide agencies such as the police with unique powers to manage deviant persons by forcing the recipients, via the threat of criminal sanction on breach of the injunction, to engage in self-control of their behaviour. This article develops understandings of how contractual injunctions are actually used in practice by the police. Analyses of the different ways contractual injunctions are directed at certain social groups are developed in relation to police occupational cultures that place limits and possibilities on their application. It concludes by locating the broader social effects of contractual injunctions with issues of urban marginality and growing powers to criminalize social predicaments.
机译:合同禁令已成为社会控制的主要手段。它们通过使接收者通过违反禁令而受到刑事制裁的威胁,迫使他们对自己的行为进行自我控制,从而赋予警察等机构独特的权力来管理越轨人员。本文使警方对合同禁令在实践中的使用有了进一步的了解。针对与警察职业文化相关的合同禁令针对特定社会群体的不同方式进行了分析,这些职业文化限制了其适用范围和可能性。最后,通过将合同禁令的更广泛的社会影响与城市边缘化和将社会困境定为犯罪的权力日益增强的问题联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号