首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Aesthetics >Opera and the Limits of Philosophy: on Bernard Williams's Music Criticism
【24h】

Opera and the Limits of Philosophy: on Bernard Williams's Music Criticism

机译:歌剧和哲学的局限性:伯纳德·威廉姆斯的音乐批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper provides a reading of the opera criticism of Bernard Williams in the light of his philosophical writings. Beginning with the observations that his philosophical writing lacks engagement with musical and aesthetic issues, and his operatic writing appears to present no particular philosophy of the subject, I try to draw together certain themes by mapping Williams's operatic concerns onto his philosophical project more generally. I argue that the 'excessive' nature of the artform-the idea that opera tends to exceed its musico-dramatic functions-was of particular interest to Williams, partly because it resonated with his dislike of easy theoretical solutions to thorny practical issues. More specifically, Mozart's Cosi fan tutte is related, via the way the way its emotional register exceeds its dramatic context, to the issues examined by Williams in his work on moral luck. Similarly, I discuss the way Williams's essay on Debussy's Pelléas et Mélisande seems to hint at an account of the emotions which is otherwise missing from Williams's oeuvre.
机译:本文根据伯纳德·威廉姆斯的哲学著作,对其歌剧批评进行了解读。首先观察到他的哲学著作缺乏音乐和美学问题的介入,而他的歌剧著作似乎没有提出该主题的特定哲学,我试图通过将威廉姆斯的歌剧关注点更笼统地映射到他的哲学计划上,来整理某些主题。我认为艺术形式的“过度”本质(歌剧倾向于超越其音乐戏剧功能)这一思想引起了威廉姆斯的特别兴趣,部分原因是它与他不喜欢棘手的实际问题的简单理论解决方案产生共鸣。更具体地说,莫扎特的《科西迷》 tutte通过情感表达超出其戏剧性背景的方式与威廉姆斯在道德运气工作中所考察的问题相关。同样,我讨论了威廉姆斯关于德彪西的《佩莱亚斯》和《梅里桑德》的文章似乎暗示了某种情感的说法,而威廉姆斯的作品中缺少了这种情感。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Aesthetics》 |2010年第4期|p.469-479|共11页
  • 作者

    Guy Dammann;

  • 作者单位

    Guildhall School of Music and Drama;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:12:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号