首页> 外文期刊>Brain and cognition >Lateral biases and reading direction: A dissociation between aesthetic preference and line bisection
【24h】

Lateral biases and reading direction: A dissociation between aesthetic preference and line bisection

机译:横向偏向和阅读方向:审美偏好与线平分线之间的分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Perceptual asymmetries for tasks involving aesthetic preference or line bisection can be affected by asymmetrical neurological mechanisms or left/right reading habits. This study investigated the relative contribution of these mechanisms in 100 readers of Japanese and English. Participants made aesthetic judgments between pairs of mirror-reversed pictures showing: (a) static objects, (b) moving objects and (c) landscapes. A line bisection task was also administered. There was a strong effect of reading direction for static and mobile objects whereby Japanese readers preferred objects with a right-to-left directionality (and vice versa for English readers). In contrast, similar patterns were observed for the Japanese and English readers for the landscape and line bisection tasks. The results show that reading habits affect aesthetic judgments for static and moving object tasks, but not the landscape and line bisection tasks. The difference between the tasks may be related to the horizontal/vertical geometry of the stimuli, which makes the landscape and line bisection tasks more prone to universal effects related to cerebral dominance.
机译:涉及美学偏好或线平分的任务的感知不对称性可能会受到不对称神经机制或左/右阅读习惯的影响。这项研究调查了这些机制在100名日语和英语读者中的相对贡献。参与者在成对的镜像反转图片之间做出了美学判断,这些图片显示:(a)静态物体,(b)运动物体和(c)景观。还执行了线平分任务。静态和移动物体的阅读方向效果很强,日本读者更喜欢具有从右到左方向性的物体(英语阅读者反之亦然)。相反,对于日语和英语读者,在景观和线平分任务中观察到了类似的模式。结果表明,阅读习惯会影响静态和移动对象任务的审美判断,但不会影响景观和线平分任务。任务之间的差异可能与刺激的水平/垂直几何形状有关,这使得景观和线平分任务更容易产生与大脑优势有关的普遍效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号