首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >IS A LOGGING ROAD'S COLLECTED RUNOFF EXEMPT FROM NPDES PERMITTING?-RETHINKING THE EPA'S 'SILVICULTURAL RULE'
【24h】

IS A LOGGING ROAD'S COLLECTED RUNOFF EXEMPT FROM NPDES PERMITTING?-RETHINKING THE EPA'S 'SILVICULTURAL RULE'

机译:是NPDES许可的伐木之路的径流吗?-重新审视EPA的“文明规则”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The EPA's various iterations of the Silvicultural Rule have succeeded in circumventing the Clean Water Act's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting requirements for decades. Although the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Broxvn significantly narrows the applicability of the Rule, the decision has left the status of the Silvicultural Rule unclear. Moreover, EPA's latest regulations regarding stormwater discharges-which purportedly aim to provide clarity-only muddy the water. In the Supreme Court's coming consideration of the validity of the Silvicultural Rule, it should take the opportunity to explicitly invalidate the Rule as inconsistent with the CWA. Moreover, in its decision, the Court should not be influenced by the EPA's latest regulations because they do not alter the substance of the Silvicultural Rule and fail to conform to the requirements of the CWA.
机译:EPA对“造林法规”的各种修改已成功规避了《清洁水法》的国家污染物排放消除系统的要求,这一要求已有数十年的历史了。尽管第九巡回法院最近在西北环境保护防御中心诉Broxvn案中做出的裁决大大缩小了该规则的适用范围,但该裁决仍使营林规则的地位不清楚。此外,EPA关于雨水排放的最新规定据称旨在提供澄清度,仅使水变得浑浊。在最高法院即将对《造林规则》的有效性进行考虑的过程中,应借此机会明确宣布该规则无效,因为该规则与《民事诉讼法》相抵触。此外,法院在判决中不应受到EPA最新法规的影响,因为它们不会改变《森林栽培规则》的内容并且不符合CWA的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号