首页> 外文期刊>Body image >Testing the Tripartite Influence Model among heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women
【24h】

Testing the Tripartite Influence Model among heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women

机译:在异性恋,双性恋和女同性恋女性中测试三方影响模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This cross-sectional study explored similarities and differences between heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women in levels of, and relationships between, the following constructs using a Tripartite Influence Model framework: family, peer, and media appearance pressures, thin- and muscular-ideal internalization, and eating disorder (ED) pathology. Self-identified heterosexual (n = 1,528), bisexual (n = 89), and lesbian (n = 278) undergraduate women completed the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Sexual orientation differences in appearance pressures, appearance-ideal internalization, and ED pathology were examined via analysis of variance tests. Relationships between these variables were examined with multi-group path analyses, controlling forage, race/ethnicity, and body mass index. Compared with lesbian women, heterosexual and bisexual women reported higher levels of peer appearance pressures. Paths from peer appearance pressures and thin-ideal internalization to shape/weight overvaluation and body dissatisfaction were strongest for bisexual women. Overall, results indicate notable similarities between heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women. However, preliminary evidence for potential differences highlights the importance of examining variation in ED risk between sexual minority subgroups. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项横断面研究使用三方影响模型框架探讨了以下结构在异性恋,双性恋和女同性恋之间的异同:家庭,同伴和媒体的外表压力,薄弱和肌肉理想内部化和进食障碍(ED)病理。自我识别的异性恋(n = 1,528),双性恋(n = 89)和女同性恋(n = 278)的大学女性完成了《关于外观文化问卷的社会文化态度调查表-4》和《饮食失调问题调查问卷》。通过方差分析分析检查了外观压力,外观理想化和ED病理方面的性取向差异。通过多组路径分析,控制饲草,种族/民族和体重指数检查了这些变量之间的关系。与女同性恋者相比,异性恋和双性恋妇女的同伴相貌压力较高。对于双性恋女性而言,从同伴外表压力和理想的内在化到形状/体重高估和身体不满的途径最为强烈。总体而言,结果表明,异性恋,双性恋和女同性恋女性之间存在显着相似性。然而,潜在差异的初步证据凸显了检查性少数亚群之间ED风险差异的重要性。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号