首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Law Report >Will Biotechnology Companies Lose Ability to Restrict Production of Their Self-Replicating Products?; Merck Did Reveal Its Process and Is Not Guilty of Fraud; BLR Archives: AstraZeneca Coverage of Cardiovascular Drug Falls for Double Patenting
【24h】

Will Biotechnology Companies Lose Ability to Restrict Production of Their Self-Replicating Products?; Merck Did Reveal Its Process and Is Not Guilty of Fraud; BLR Archives: AstraZeneca Coverage of Cardiovascular Drug Falls for Double Patenting

机译:生物技术公司会失去限制其自我复制产品生产的能力吗?默克公司没有透露其程序,也没有欺诈罪; BLR档案:阿斯利康对心血管药物的涉嫌双重专利保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

omputer industry that is now before the SupremenCourt is exercising biotechnology companies.nQuanta Computer, Inc. et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc.net al. (No. 06-937) is a question of patent exhaustionn(first sale): “Whether patent rights are exhausted by anlicensee’s authorized sale of a patented product to annauthorized purchaser, where that product has no reasonablenuse other than in practicing the patented invention.”
机译:SuprememCourt之前的计算机行业已经开始使用生物技术公司。nQuanta Computer,Inc.等。诉LG Electronics,Inc.net等。 (第06-937号)是专利权耗尽(首次出售)的问题:“被许可人将专利产品授权出售给无权购买者的权利是否被用尽,该产品除实践专利发明外没有其他合理使用权。 ”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biotechnology Law Report》 |2008年第1期|p.15-20|共6页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Litigation;

    机译:诉讼;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号