...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical Microdevices >Numerical evaluation and experimental validation of cross-flow microfiltration device design
【24h】

Numerical evaluation and experimental validation of cross-flow microfiltration device design

机译:错流微滤装置设计的数值评估和实验验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research presents a comprehensive analysis of the design and validation of a cross-flow microfiltration device for separation of microspheres based on size. Simulation results showed that pillar size, pillar shape, incorporation of back-flow preventers, and rounding of pillar layouts affected flow patterns in a cross-flow microfiltration device. Simulation results suggest that larger pillar sizes reduce filtration capacity by decreasing the density of microfiltration gaps in the device. Therefore, 10m rather than 20m diameter pillars were incorporated in the device. Fluid flow was not greatly affected when comparing circular, octagonal, and hexagonal pillars. However, side-channel fluid velocities decreased when using triangular and square pillars. The lengths of back-flow prevention walls were optimized to completely prevent back flow without inhibiting filtration ability. A trade-off was observed in the designs of the pillar layouts; while rounding the pillars layout in the channels bends eliminated stagnation areas, the design also decreased side-channel fluid velocity compared to the right-angle layout. Experimental separation efficiency was tested using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and silicon microfluidic devices with microspheres simulating white and red blood cells. Efficiencies for separation of small microspheres to the side channels ranged from 73 to 75%. The silicon devices retained the large microspheres in the main channel with efficiencies between 95 and 100%, but these efficiencies were lower with PDMS devices and were affected by sphere concentration. Additionally, PDMS devices resulted in greater agglomeration of spheres when compared to silicon devices. PDMS devices, however, were easier and less expensive to fabricate.
机译:这项研究提供了基于尺寸的错流微滤装置分离微球的设计和验证的全面分析。模拟结果表明,立柱尺寸,立柱形状,防回流装置的结合以及立柱布局的圆化都会影响错流微滤装置中的流型。仿真结果表明,较大的色谱柱尺寸会通过降低设备中微滤间隙的密度来降低过滤能力。因此,将10m直径而不是20m直径的柱子合并到设备中。比较圆形,八角形和六边形柱子时,流体流动不会受到很大影响。但是,使用三角形和正方形支柱时,旁通道流体速度会降低。优化了防回流壁的长度,以在不抑制过滤能力的情况下完全防止回流。在支柱布局的设计中观察到了一个权衡;在通道中的支柱布局变圆的同时,消除了停滞区域,与直角布局相比,该设计还降低了侧通道流体速度。使用聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)和带有微球模拟白血球和红血球的硅微流体装置测试了实验分离效率。将小微球分离到侧通道的效率为73%至75%。硅器件将大型微球保留在主通道中,效率在95%到100%之间,但是对于PDMS器件,这些效率较低,并且受球体浓度影响。另外,与硅器件相比,PDMS器件导致球体更大的团聚。但是,PDMS设备制造起来更容易且成本更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号