首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): A review of state-of-the-art and further developments
【24h】

Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): A review of state-of-the-art and further developments

机译:用于测试改进型炉灶(ICSs)的实验室规程:最新技术和进一步发展的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Around 2.7 billion people rely on biomass fuelled inefficient devices for cooking and heating. Improved Cooking Stoves are promoted as a means to mitigate the economic, environmental and social implications of this practice. However, their diffusion is hindered by a number of factors, including in particular the lack of agreement on performance evaluation methodologies. Laboratory protocols are designed to give useful indications to cookstoves developers, in order to improve their performance under controlled conditions, while field protocols provide the assessment of real performance of a cookstove in a given context. However, due to high time and finance requirements of the latter, lab results are often used also for stoves selection, also because of a general misunderstanding regarding their correct utilisation. In this work, we provide a review of all lab protocols officially published to date, comparing conceptual and technical aspects. We find that no protocol takes into account all the relevant factors at once. As a result, lab tests carry little information about real field performance, and can be misleading regarding stoves optimisation. Therefore, the analysis reveals the need to define better standards, regarding: (ⅰ) repeatability, metrics and statistical analysis of results; (ⅱ) burn sequences calibrated from time to time according to the specific user.
机译:约有27亿人依靠生物质燃料效率低下的设备进行烹饪和取暖。促进了改进炉灶的使用,以减轻这种做法对经济,环境和社会的影响。但是,它们的传播受到许多因素的阻碍,特别是在绩效评估方法上缺乏共识。实验室规程旨在为炊具开发人员提供有用的指示,以改善他们在受控条件下的性能,而现场规程则可以评估给定环境下炊具的实际性能。然而,由于后者的高时间和财务要求,实验室结果经常也用于炉灶的选择,也由于对炉灶正确使用的普遍误解。在这项工作中,我们对迄今为止正式发布的所有实验方案进行了回顾,比较了概念和技术方面。我们发现没有协议会同时考虑所有相关因素。结果,实验室测试几乎没有有关实际性能的信息,并且可能在炉灶优化方面产生误导。因此,分析表明有必要针对以下方面定义更好的标准:(ⅰ)结果的可重复性,度量和统计分析; (ⅱ)根据特定用户不时校准的刻录顺序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号