首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Biomethane grid injection or biomethane liquefaction: A technical-economic analysis
【24h】

Biomethane grid injection or biomethane liquefaction: A technical-economic analysis

机译:生物甲烷网格注入或生物甲烷液化:技术经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The gradual reduction of subsidies for electricity production from biogas and the raising interest of bio-methane as an integration to natural gas market force the biogas plant owners to choose alternative solutions for biogas exploitation.In this study, two solutions for biomethane distribution have been compared: biomethane liquefaction and grid injection. The analysis was carried out as a function of gas connection cost, electric tariff, selling price and type of expander adopted in the liquefaction cycle (radial turbines or screw expanders). A nitrogen Joule-Brayton reverse cycle was considered for liquefaction. A detailed model of the cycle was developed in Aspen Hysys and optimized to minimize the energy specific consumption. Results show that expander efficiency has a key role in the liquefaction scenario. Screw expanders lead to a specific consumption 1.45 times higher than radial turbines but reduce capital costs by a factor of 1.39.Biomethane grid injection is the preferable solution in terms of investment risk if the connection cost is below 500 k$, independently on the electricity price. As far as it concerns the profit, liquefaction with radial turbines is preferable up to electricity price of 0.23 $/kWh. A sensitivity analysis on product selling prices shows that biomethane grid injection is always the most profitable solution when connection costs are low. For higher connections cost, liquefaction with radial turbines is the best solution for minimizing the investment risk and maximizing the profit for most of the combination of selling prices.
机译:沼气发电补贴的逐步减少以及与沼气市场一体化所产生的沼气的兴起促使沼气厂主选择沼气开发的替代解决方案。在本研究中,比较了两种沼气分配解决方案:生物甲烷液化和网格注入。根据燃气连接成本,电价,售价和液化循环中使用的膨胀机(径向涡轮机或螺杆膨胀机)的类型进行分析。考虑将氮焦耳-布雷顿反向循环液化。在Aspen Hysys中开发了详细的循环模型,并对其进行了优化以最大程度地降低能耗。结果表明,膨胀机效率在液化方案中起着关键作用。螺杆膨胀机的单位能耗比径向涡轮机高1.45倍,但可将资本成本降低1.39倍。就连接风险而言,如果连接成本低于500 k $(与电价无关),则注入生物甲烷网格是投资风险的首选解决方案。就利润而言,最好采用径向涡轮液化,直至电价为0.23美元/千瓦时。对产品售价的敏感性分析表明,当连接成本较低时,生物甲烷气注入始终是最有利可图的解决方案。为了获得更高的连接成本,对于大多数销售价格组合来说,采用径向涡轮液化是将投资风险最小化和利润最大化的最佳解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biomass & bioenergy》 |2019年第8期|105264.1-105264.12|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

    Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, I-56126 Pisa, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biomethane; Liquefaction; Biomethane grid injection; Aspen hysys; Economic analysis;

    机译:生物甲烷;液化;生物甲烷网格注射;Aspen Hysys;经济分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号