...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomarkers >A comparison of creatinine vs. specific gravity to correct for urinary dilution of cotinine
【24h】

A comparison of creatinine vs. specific gravity to correct for urinary dilution of cotinine

机译:肌酐与比重的比较以校正可替宁的尿液稀释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context. The validity of urinary correction standards has not been established for most analytes. Methods: We compared urinary creatinine and specific gravity as dilution correction standards for cotinine in a community-based study of smokers. Results: Models of blood cotinine regressed against CR or SG (measured by total soluble solids) significantly improved the fit compared to a model without a dilution measure (P< 0.01).There were no differences in model fit between CR-and SG-corrected values. Both CR and SG were significant predictors of urinary cotinine regressed against cigarettes smoked per day (P< 0.01). Conclusion: CR and SG are valid and interchangeable correction standards.
机译:上下文。对于大多数分析物,尚未建立尿液校正标准的有效性。方法:在一项基于社区的吸烟者研究中,我们比较了尿肌酐和比重作为可替宁的稀释校正标准。结果:血液可替宁抗CR或SG的模型(通过总可溶性固形物测量)与没有稀释措施的模型相比显着改善了拟合度(P <0.01).CR校正和SG校正后的模型拟合无差异价值观。 CR和SG都是尿中可替宁相对于每天吸烟的消退的重要预测因子(P <0.01)。结论:CR和SG是有效且可互换的校正标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号