首页> 外文期刊>Biology and Philosophy >Against reduction A critical notice of Molecular models: philosophical papers on molecular biology by Sahotra Sarkar
【24h】

Against reduction A critical notice of Molecular models: philosophical papers on molecular biology by Sahotra Sarkar

机译:反对还原分子模型的重要提示:萨霍特拉·萨卡尔(Sahotra Sarkar)关于分子生物学的哲学论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Molecular Models: Philosophical Papers on Molecular Biology, Sahotra Sarkar presents a historical and philosophical analysis of four important themes in philosophy of science that have been influenced by discoveries in molecular biology. These are: reduction, function, information and directed mutation. I argue that there is an important difference between the cases of function and information and the more complex case of scientific reduction. In the former cases it makes sense to taxonomise important variations in scientific and philosophical usage of the terms “function” and “information”. However, the variety of usage of “reduction” across scientific disciplines (and across philosophy of science) makes such taxonomy inappropriate. Sarkar presents reduction as a set of facts about the world that science has discovered, but the facts in question are remarkably disparate; variously semantic, epistemic and ontological. I argue that the more natural conclusion of Sarkar’s analysis is eliminativism about reduction as a scientific concept.
机译:在《分子模型:关于分子生物学的哲学论文》中,萨霍特拉·萨卡尔(Sahotra Sarkar)对受分子生物学发现影响的四个重要科学哲学主题进行了历史和哲学分析。它们是:还原,功能,信息和定向突变。我认为功能和信息案例与更复杂的科学还原案例之间存在重要区别。在前一种情况下,对科学和哲学上术语“功能”和“信息”的重要变化进行分类是有意义的。但是,跨科学学科(以及跨科学哲学)的“减少”用法的多样性使这种分类法不合适。萨卡(Sarkar)将还原表示为科学发现的关于世界的一系列事实,但是所讨论的事实截然不同。各种语义,认识论和本体论。我认为,萨卡分析的更自然的结论是对还原作为一种科学概念的消极主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号