首页> 外文期刊>Biological Invasions >Freshwater crayfish invasions: former crayfish invader Galician crayfish hands title “invasive” over to new invader spiny-cheek crayfish
【24h】

Freshwater crayfish invasions: former crayfish invader Galician crayfish hands title “invasive” over to new invader spiny-cheek crayfish

机译:淡水小龙虾入侵:前小龙虾入侵者加利西亚小龙虾将标题“入侵”移交给新的入侵者多刺小龙虾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Biological invasions are a major threat to global biodiversity. Invasive freshwater crayfish in that context are especially prominent for their negative effects on both ecosystem integrity and native crayfish. However, some systems may have supported a crayfish species not originally native to the system without perceivable negative consequences for the ecosystem while other invasive crayfish species may constitute a major threat to ecosystem stability. Here I present an example how two crayfish, the spiny-cheek and the Galician crayfish both by researchers and governmental agencies considered non-native differ in their threats to the native ecosystem. Whereas the spiny-cheek crayfish is a recent potentially disease-transmitting and still spreading invader with high local densities the Galician crayfish might be part of the lake’s fauna since several hundred years, appears in lower densities and is unlikely to be a vector of disease. Therefore, regardless of the Galician crayfish’s actual date of introduction it is thus a rather “old and integrated” invader, which is now being faced and itself potentially threatened by the emergence of a “new and dangerous” invader: the spiny-cheek crayfish. This also exemplifies that in the face of often insufficient scientific information about dates of species introductions care should be taken in postulating species as invasive and dangerous without any form of risk assessment for their impact on the ecosystem.
机译:生物入侵是对全球生物多样性的主要威胁。在这种情况下,入侵性淡水小龙虾因其对生态系统完整性和本地小龙虾的负面影响而特别突出。但是,某些系统可能支持了最初不是该系统原生的小龙虾物种,而没有对生态系统造成可察觉的负面影响,而其他入侵小龙虾物种可能对生态系统的稳定性构成重大威胁。在这里,我举一个例子,研究人员和政府机构将两个小龙虾,多刺的小龙虾和加利西亚小龙虾对本地生态系统的威胁视为不同。刺腮小龙虾是最近潜在的可能传播疾病且仍在传播的本地高密度入侵者,而加利西亚小龙虾可能已有数百年历史,是该湖动物区系的一部分,密度较低,不太可能成为疾病的媒介。因此,无论加利西亚小龙虾的实际引进日期如何,它都是一个“古老而综合的”入侵者,现在正面临着这种入侵,它本身可能会受到“新的和危险的”入侵者(即多刺的小龙虾)的出现的威胁。这也说明,面对有关物种引入日期的科学信息通常不足时,应谨慎地将物种定为入侵物种和危险物种,而无需对它们对生态系统的影响进行任何形式的风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号