首页> 外文期刊>Bioinformatics >Two-stage designs applying methods differing in costs
【24h】

Two-stage designs applying methods differing in costs

机译:两阶段设计应用成本不同的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Motivation: Two-stage pilot and integrated designs are powerful tools for investigating large numbers of hypotheses. Asymptotically, optimal two-stage designs controlling the familywise error or false discovery rate are considered when costs and effect sizes per measurement differ between stages and total costs are constrained.Results: Depending on the cost and effect size ratios between the measurements, it is generally more powerful to apply two-stage procedures using one measurement method at both stages. For the practically relevant case that the same method is applied at both stages but designing the second-stage measurements raises extra costs, two-stage designs are more powerful than the single-stage design even for large costs ratios. The power of the optimal pilot and integrated two-stage designs generally are similar, however, the integrated approach is less sensitive even to severe design misspecifications in the planning phase.
机译:动机:两阶段试验和集成设计是研究大量假设的强大工具。渐近地,当每次测量的成本和效应大小在阶段之间不同且总成本受到约束时,可以考虑控制家族错误或错误发现率的最佳两阶段设计。结果:通常取决于测量之间的成本和效应大小比率在两个阶段使用一种测量方法来应用两阶段过程的功能更强大。对于实际上相关的情况,即在两个阶段都应用相同的方法,但是设计第二阶段的测量会增加额外的成本,即使对于较大的成本比率,两阶段的设计也比单阶段的设计更强大。最佳试验和集成两阶段设计的功能通常相似,但是,即使在计划阶段对严重的设计失误,集成方法也不敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号