...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioelectromagnetics >The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study
【24h】

The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study

机译:射频个人光度计确定的暴露量与人体暴露量之间的关联:模拟研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The selection of an adequate exposure assessment approach is imperative for the quality of epidemiological studies. The use of personal exposimeters turned out to be a reasonable approach to determine exposure profiles, however, certain limitations regarding the absolute values delivered by the devices have to be considered. Apart from the limited dynamic range, it has to be taken into account that these devices give only an approximation of the exposure due to the influence of the body of the person carrying the exposimeter, the receiver characteristics of the exposimeter, as well as the dependence of the measured value on frequency band, channel, slot configuration, and communication traffic. In this study, the relationship between the field strength measured close to the human body at the location of the exposimeter and the exposure, that is, the field strength at the location of the human body without the human body present, is investigated by numerical means using the Visible Human model as an anatomical phantom. Two different scenarios were chosen: (1) For FM, GSM, and UMTS an urban outdoor scenario was examined that included a transmitting antenna mounted on the roof of one of four buildings at a street crossing, (2) For WLAN an indoor scenario was investigated. For GSM the average degree of underestimation by the exposimeter (relation of the average field levels at the location of the exposimeter to the field level averaged over the volume of the human body without the body present) was 0.76, and for UMTS 0.87; for FM no underestimation was found, the ratio was 1. In the case of WLAN the degree of underestimation was more pronounced, the ratio was 0.64. This study clearly suggests that a careful evaluation of correction factors for different scenarios is needed prior to the definition of the study protocol. It has to be noted that the reference scenario used in this study does not allow for final conclusions on general correction factors. Bioelectromagnetics 31:535–545, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:选择适当的接触评估方法对于流行病学研究的质量至关重要。事实证明,使用个人光度计是确定暴露曲线的一种合理方法,但是,必须考虑有关设备所传递的绝对值的某些限制。除了受限制的动态范围外,还必须考虑到,由于携带曝光计的人员的身体,曝光计的接收器特性以及相关性的影响,这些设备只能给出近似的曝光量。频段,信道,时隙配置和通信流量上的测量值。在这项研究中,通过数值方法研究了在曝光计位置附近人体处测得的场强与曝光量之间的关系,即在不存在人体的情况下人体位置处的场强之间的关系。使用“可视人”模型作为解剖模型。选择了两种不同的方案:(1)对于FM,GSM和UMTS,研究了一种城市户外方案,其中包括安装在一条路口的四座建筑物之一的屋顶上的发射天线,(2)对于WLAN,一种室内方案是调查。对于GSM,测光仪低估的平均程度(测光仪所在位置的平均场水平与在没有人体存在的情况下人体的平均场水平之间的关系)为0.76,而UMTS为0.87;对于FM,未发现低估的比率为1。在WLAN情况下,低估的程度更为明显,比率为0.64。这项研究清楚地表明,在定义研究方案之前,需要对不同情况下的校正因子进行仔细评估。必须注意的是,本研究中使用的参考方案无法得出有关一般校正因子的最终结论。生物电磁学,2010年31:535-545。©2010 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bioelectromagnetics》 |2010年第7期|p.535-545|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Seibersdorf Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria|Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria;

    Seibersdorf Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria;

    Seibersdorf Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria;

    Seibersdorf Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria;

    Seibersdorf Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria;

    Laboratory for Electromagnetic Fields and Microwave Electronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland;

    Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    exposimeter; exposure; RF; simulation;

    机译:曝光计;曝光;RF;模拟;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号