...
首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity & Conservation >The butterfly fauna of Wisconsin bogs: lessons for conservation
【24h】

The butterfly fauna of Wisconsin bogs: lessons for conservation

机译:威斯康星州的蝴蝶动物区系:保护的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During 2002–2009, we surveyed butterflies at 73 bogs, 20 adjacent lowland roadsides, and 5 nearby upland roadsides in northern Wisconsin and three bogs in central Wisconsin, with additional observations from 1986 to 2001. Especially in northern Wisconsin, bogs are relatively unaffected by humans, but naturally comprise <1% of the landscape. Bog specialist species composition varied by bog type (muskeg, kettlehole, coastal peatland). Specialist abundance also varied significantly both among bog types and within type among sites. A number of bog specialists frequently occurred in numerous examples of bogs, including all three types. But virtually no specialist individuals occurred in nearby upland roadsides. Northern Wisconsin bogs had similar specialist species richness compared to large barrens and heaths in the same region. Specialist species comprised a small proportion (10%) of all butterfly species recorded in bogs, similar to proportions reported for specialists in tallgrass prairie and barrens. However, specialists accounted for nearly half the total individuals recorded in bogs, comparable to proportions of specialists found in less fragmented vegetation (barrens) and larger patches of favorably managed prairie, but far exceeding proportions observed in other highly fragmented prairie patches. A fundamental lesson may be that aiming to conserve typical ecosystems, even if native, and their average processes, leads to average (generalist) butterflies. Bogs have different vegetation types superimposed on each other, including bog, heath, forest, sedge meadow, and wet meadow associates in the same spots. Conservation management needs to avoid simplifying the vegetation to one layer, reducing specialist fauna. Long-term vegetative consistency, as in bogs, is advised for conservation management of specialist butterflies in other fragmented vegetations.
机译:在2002–2009年期间,我们对威斯康星州北部的73处沼泽,相邻的20个低地路边和5个附近的高地路边以及威斯康星州中部的3个沼泽进行了蝴蝶调查,并于1986年至2001年进行了观察。特别是在威斯康星州北部,沼泽受到的影响相对较小人类,但自然构成了不到1%的景观。沼泽专业物种组成因沼泽类型(麝香,壶眼,沿海泥炭地)而异。沼泽类型之间以及地点之间的类型内,专家的丰富度也有很大差异。许多沼泽专家经常出现在许多沼泽实例中,包括所有三种类型。但是,在附近的高地路旁几乎没有专业人士。与同一地区的大片荒地和荒地相比,威斯康星州北部的沼泽具有相似的专业物种丰富度。沼泽中记录的所有蝴蝶物种中,专长物种只占很小的比例(10%),与高草草原和贫瘠地区专家的报告比例相似。但是,专家占沼泽记录的总数的近一半,与零散的植被(贫瘠的土地)和较大的良好管理的大片斑块中发现的专家的比例相当,但远远超过其他高度零散的大片斑块中发现的比例。一个基本的教训可能是旨在保护典型的生态系统,即使原生的和其平均过程导致了中等(一般)蝴蝶的出现。沼泽具有不同的植被类型,彼此重叠,包括沼泽,荒地,森林,莎草草甸和湿草甸同伴。保护管理需要避免将植被简化为一层,从而减少特殊动物区系。建议对沼泽中的植物长期保持一致性,以管理其他零散植被中的蝴蝶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号