...
首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity & Conservation >Biodiversity surrogacy: indicator taxa as predictors of total species richness in Brazilian Atlantic forest and Caatinga
【24h】

Biodiversity surrogacy: indicator taxa as predictors of total species richness in Brazilian Atlantic forest and Caatinga

机译:生物多样性代孕:指示生物分类作为巴西大西洋森林和卡廷加物种总丰富度的预测指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of indicator taxa as biodiversity surrogates has received widespread attention in conservation planning, but remains a highly contentious issue. Here we assess biodiversity surrogacy in the two most important biomes of tropical northeastern Brazil, Atlantic forest and Caatinga. We examine the extent to which species richness is correlated among taxonomic groups, and assess relationships between the richness of individual groups, and combinations of groups and total species richness. We introduce a new approach to dealing with autocorrelation between focal taxon richness and total species richness, using standardized data such that each taxon is given equal weight. Our Atlantic forest data covered seven taxa (bryophytes, pteridophytes, trees, ants, euglosine bees, birds, and mammals; total of 768 species) sampled from 12 sites; in Caatinga it was four taxa (trees, spiders, beetles and ants; total of 184 species) from 25 sites. Our results showed that: (1) in nearly all cases the species richnesses of individual taxa were significantly correlated with each other; (2) the species richnesses of most individual taxa were significantly correlated with total species richness in both biomes; (3) only two taxa were required for excellent (R 2 > 80%) surrogacy of total species richness in both biomes; and (4) the same two taxa (trees and ants) can provide reasonable (R 2 > 60%) surrogacy for total richness in these contrasting biomes. Our findings therefore suggest that the ‘shopping basket of taxa’ required for effective biodiversity surrogacy may not only need to be very small (two taxa), but may also be very limited in composition.
机译:在生物多样性保护中使用指示性分类单元已受到保护规划的广泛关注,但仍然是一个有争议的问题。在这里,我们评估了巴西热带东北部两个最重要的生物群落中的生物多样性替代权,即大西洋森林和卡廷加。我们研究了分类学组之间物种丰富度相关的程度,并评估了各个组的丰富度,组与总物种丰富度之间的关系。我们引入了一种新方法来处理焦点分类单元丰富度与总物种丰富度之间的自相关,它使用标准化数据,使每个分类单元都具有相同的权重。我们的大西洋森林数据涵盖了从12个地点采样的7个分类单元(苔藓植物,蕨类植物,树木,蚂蚁,风湿性蜜蜂,鸟类和哺乳动物;共768种)。在Caatinga,有25个地点的四个分类单元(树木,蜘蛛,甲虫和蚂蚁;共184种)。我们的结果表明:(1)在几乎所有情况下,单个分类单元的物种丰富度之间都存在显着的相关性; (2)在两个生物群落中,大多数个体分类单元的物种丰富度与总物种丰富度显着相关; (3)两个生物群落中总物种丰富度的优异代孕率(R 2

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号