首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity and Conservation >Towards the use of ecological heterogeneity to design reserve networks: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece
【24h】

Towards the use of ecological heterogeneity to design reserve networks: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece

机译:致力于利用生态异质性设计保护区网络:以希腊达迪亚国家公园为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we present a novel approach for using ecological heterogeneity in reserve design. We measured five ecological heterogeneity indices (EHI) and we used a database of six biological groups (woody plants, orchids, orthopterans, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna and passerine birds) across 30 sites in a Mediterranean reserve (Greece). We found that all the five EHI were significantly related to the overall species richness and to the species richness of woody plants and birds. Two indices, measuring vertical vegetation complexity (1/D) and horizontal heterogeneity of landcover types (SIDI) in terms of Simpson’s index, predicted well overall species richness and had significantly higher values inside the complementary reserve networks designed after five of the six biological groups. We compared five methods of forming reserve networks. The method of ecological heterogeneity (selecting those sites with the greatest 1/D and then SIDI) was less efficient (non-significantly) than the species-based methods (scoring and complementary networks) but significantly more efficient than the random method (randomly selected network). We also found that the method of complementary ecological heterogeneity (selecting those sites where each EHI had its maximum value) was not that efficient, as it did not differ significantly from the random method. These results underline the potential of the ecological heterogeneity method as an alternative tool in reserve design.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种在保护区设计中利用生态异质性的新方法。我们测量了地中海保护区(希腊)中30个地点的六个生物组(木本植物,兰花,直翅类动物,水生和陆生爬虫类动物以及雀形目鸟类)的五个生态异质性指数(EHI),并使用了该数据库。我们发现所有五个EHI与总体物种丰富度以及木本植物和鸟类的物种丰富度显着相关。根据辛普森指数来衡量垂直植被复杂度(1 / D)和土地覆被类型的水平异质性(SIDI)的两个指数预测了很好的总体物种丰富度,并且在六个生物群中的五个构成的互补保护区网络内具有较高的价值。我们比较了形成备用网络的五种方法。生态异质性方法(选择那些具有最大1 / D的位置,然后选择SIDI)比基于物种的方法(评分和互补网络)效率低(无意义),但比随机方法(随机选择)效率高得多网络)。我们还发现,互补生态异质性方法(选择每个EHI具有最大值的位点)效率不高,因为它与随机方法没有显着差异。这些结果强调了生态异质性方法作为储层设计中替代工具的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号