...
首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >BICON, INC. V. STRAUMANN Co.: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED CLAIM VITIATION TO ILLUSTRATE A NEW LIMITING PRINCIPLE ON THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
【24h】

BICON, INC. V. STRAUMANN Co.: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED CLAIM VITIATION TO ILLUSTRATE A NEW LIMITING PRINCIPLE ON THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS

机译:BICON,V. STRAUMANN Co .:联邦电路特地排除了索赔诉讼,以阐明对等原则的新的限制原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

If the Federal Circuit had its way, the doctrine of equivalents would be no more. Over the past few years, the court has literally thrown everything but the kitchen sink at the doctrine through its adoption of a number of rules restricting the doctrine's scope. Because the Supreme Court only reprimanded the Federal Circuit for those principles intending to eliminate or drastically change the doctrine of equivalents, the Federal Circuit was free to implement rules which slightly but unquestionably impaired the application of the doctrine. Without further intervention by the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit's gradual reduction of the doctrine's scope has the potential to effectively destroy the doctrine of equivalents over time.
机译:如果联邦巡回法院采取行动,那么等同原则就不再存在。在过去的几年中,法院通过采用一系列限制该学说范围的规则,实际上将厨房沉没了该学说。由于最高法院仅就旨在消除或彻底改变等效原则的原则谴责了联邦巡回法院,因此联邦巡回法院可以自由实施规则,这会稍微但毫无疑问地削弱该原则的适用性。在没有最高法院进一步干预的情况下,联邦巡回法院逐渐缩小该学说的范围,有可能随着时间的推移有效销毁该学说。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号