...
首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >Licensing Complementary Patents: 'Patent Trolls,' Market Structure, and 'Excessive' Royalties
【24h】

Licensing Complementary Patents: 'Patent Trolls,' Market Structure, and 'Excessive' Royalties

机译:补充专利的许可:“专利巨魔”,市场结构和“过度”专利使用费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This analysis shows that the presumption that NPEs always charge higher royalties than vertically integrated companies is not warranted. It is true that if firms set linear royalties non-cooperatively, a vertically integrated firm will internalize the vertical double mark-up problem which tends to reduce royalties. However, a vertically integrated firm also has an incentive to raise its royalties in order to raise its rivals' costs and to restrict entry in the downstream market, especially among non-integrated downstream firms. The overall effect on rates is ambiguous. In fact, under some circumstances, a vertically integrated firm may charge higher royalties than its non-integrated counterpart.
机译:该分析表明,没有理由认为非营利组织总是收取比垂直整合公司更高的特许权使用费。的确,如果公司非合作地设定线性特许权使用费,那么垂直整合的公司将内部化垂直双重加价问题,这往往会降低特许权使用费。但是,垂直整合公司也有提高其特许权使用费的动机,以提高其竞争对手的成本并限制其进入下游市场,特别是在非整合下游公司中。对费率的总体影响是模棱两可的。实际上,在某些情况下,垂直整合的公司可能会比非整合的公司收取更高的特许权使用费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号