首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >Benchmarking the redesign of 'business process reengineering' curriculum: A continuous process improvement (CPI)
【24h】

Benchmarking the redesign of 'business process reengineering' curriculum: A continuous process improvement (CPI)

机译:重新设计“业务流程再造”课程的基准测试:持续改进流程(CPI)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the application of business process reengineeringrn(BPR) and benchmarking principles to redesign an undergraduate course on BPR to achieverncontinuous improvements. The principles are applied on a course on BPR in the curriculum ofrnengineering management (EM) program at Stevens Institute of Technology. The EM program aims tornprovide the students the knowledge and skills, which are necessary to work effectively at the interfacernbetween technology, management, and engineering. BPR course (EM435) is recently added to EMrnprogram's curriculum to support the need for providing the bridge between the engineering of systemsrnand business operations.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The research approach design is laid out from the time thernEM435 course is first offered in the fall of 2006 to the senior year EM students. The students arernsurveyed and areas of redesign and improvements are identified based on benchmarking againstrnABET criteria and their associated outcomes, student expectations, similar academic courses, andrnindustry expectations of skills and knowledge.rnFindings - The identification of the improvement areas in the BPR curriculum leads to a continuousrnprocess improvement (CPI) initiative, which has been continued in a more structured manner. Researchrnfindings indicate a strong support for more case studies, use of BPR tool, and real-life project in theirrninvestigation of effective pedagogy for teaching BPR to engineering undergraduates.rnResearch limitations/implications - This paper demonstrates the value of applyingrnbenchmarking and CPI methodology in maintaining effective teaching and learning of BPR concepts.rnMore empirical metrics can be developed in future to measure the success of course, improvements.rnPractical implications - The findings of this research will promote adoption of courses on BPR andrnlay a foundation for BPR curriculum in engineering. The CPI approach will provide opportunities tornanalyze improvements over a period of time.rnOriginality/value - This paper is unique in its application of benchmarking and CPI for improvingrnBPR curriculum at an undergraduate engineering level.
机译:目的-本文的目的是说明业务流程再造(BPR)和基准化原则在重新设计BPR本科课程以实现持续改进方面的应用。这些原则已应用于史蒂文斯理工学院的工程管理(EM)课程中的BPR课程。 EM计划旨在为学生提供知识和技能,这是在技术,管理和工程之间的有效接口上有效工作所必需的。 BPR课程(EM435)最近被添加到EMrnprogram的课程中,以支持在系统工程与业务运营之间架起桥梁的需求。 2006年秋天到高年级的EM学生。对学生进行调查,并根据rnABET标准及其相关结果,学生期望,类似的学术课程以及行业对技能和知识的期望确定基准,从而确定重新设计和改进的领域。持续过程改进(CPI)计划,该计划以结构化的方式得以持续。研究结果表明,有更多的案例研究,BPR工具的使用和实际项目在对工程学本科生进行BPR教学的有效教学法方面提供了有力的支持。 BPR概念的教学。将来可以开发更多的经验指标来衡量课程的成功与改进。实践意义-这项研究的结果将促进BPR课程的采用,并为工程学中的BPR课程奠定基础。 CPI方法将为一段时间内的改进提供机会。原创性/价值-本文在应用基准测试和CPI来改进本科工程水平的BPR课程方面的独特之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号