首页> 外文期刊>Bell Labs technical journal >An Analysis of the Technical and Economic Essentials for Providing Video over Fiber-to-the-Premises Networks
【24h】

An Analysis of the Technical and Economic Essentials for Providing Video over Fiber-to-the-Premises Networks

机译:通过光纤到本地网络提供视频的技术和经济要点分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a cost comparison of two video transport methodologies on a passive optical network (PON): an out-of-band radio frequency (RF) video overlay and in-band video delivered as multicast Internet Protocol (IP) packets. The RF overlay approach has traditionally been favored for video transmission on a PON due to the availability of cable television (CATV)-like components, including CATV-ready televisions, but recently the lower network costs associated with converging voice, data, and video on an all-packet network (so called "Internet Protocol television" [IPTV]) have begun to be recognized. We have quantified the full cost of the RF video overlay, taking into account all the physical parameters that affect the cost of such deployments, allowing an accurate evaluation of the economics of this system under a variety of configurations. Our IP video model estimates the cost of a multicast IP video network, using analysis of viewer data to estimate the actual bandwidth requirements in real-world IPTV deployments. Using these models we compare the cost of RF video overlay and IP video technology for fiber to the premises (FTTP). We show that the choice of the lowest-cost video solution is sensitive to take-rate and channel lineup in particular, but that IPTV is the lowest-cost solution under the majority of likely deployment circumstances.
机译:本文介绍了无源光网络(PON)上两种视频传输方法的成本比较:带外射频(RF)视频覆盖和作为多播Internet协议(IP)数据包交付的带内视频。由于具有有线电视(CATV)的组件(包括支持CATV的电视)的可用性,RF覆盖方法在传统上已被PON上的视频传输所青睐,但是最近,与语音,数据和视频的融合相关的网络成本较低。全包网络(所谓的“互联网协议电视” [IPTV])已经开始被认可。考虑到影响此类部署成本的所有物理参数,我们已经量化了RF视频覆盖的全部成本,从而可以在各种配置下准确评估该系统的经济性。我们的IP视频模型使用对观众数据的分析来估算实际IPTV部署中的实际带宽需求,从而估算组播IP视频网络的成本。使用这些模型,我们将RF视频覆盖和IP视频技术的光纤成本与房屋成本(FTTP)进行了比较。我们表明,成本最低的视频解决方案的选择尤其对传输率和频道阵容敏感,但是在大多数可能的部署环境下,IPTV都是成本最低的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号