首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis)
【24h】

Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis)

机译:卡罗来纳州山雀(Poecile carolinensis),丛生的山雀(Baeolophus bicolor)和白胸五子雀(Sitta carolinensis)的捕食者刺激和鸣叫行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence from different chickadee species (Poecile genus) indicates that birds can modify the note composition of their “chick-a-dee” calls in the presence of predator stimuli. Here, we tested the effects of predator models and the distance of those models on calls of three species foraging together at feeding stations: Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), both members of the Paridae family, and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis), a member of the Sittidae family. Model and distance affected seed-taking rates in all three species. “Chick-a-dee” calling rates were higher in the predator context for both chickadees and titmice, but we detected no predator context effects on “quank” call rates for nuthatches. Predator and distance contexts affected acoustic parameters of notes of the “chick-a-dee” calls of chickadees and titmice; no such effects were detected for nuthatch “quank” calls. These results suggest species differences in encoding of information in the primary social calls of these three species that commonly occur in multi-species flocks. Chickadees and titmice are “nuclear” species and nuthatches are “satellite” species, and these different roles might be related to the differences in vocal signaling that we detected.
机译:来自不同种类山雀(Poecile属)的证据表明,在存在捕食者刺激的情况下,鸟类可以改变其“ chick-a-dee”叫声的音符组成。在这里,我们测试了捕食者模型的影响以及这些模型的距离对在饲喂站一起觅食的三种物种的呼唤的影响:卡罗莱纳山雀(Poecile carolinensis)和簇绒山雀(Baeolophus bicolor),都是Paridae家族的成员,而白色雀科(Sitta carolinensis),the科的一员。模型和距离影响了所有三个物种的采种率。在山雀和山雀的捕食者语境中,“小鸡”的呼叫率较高,但我们未发现食肉动物的语境对五子雀的“夸克”呼叫率有影响。捕食者和距离环境影响了山雀和山雀的“小鸡”叫声的声学参数。没有针对nuthatch“ quank”调用检测到此类影响。这些结果表明,在这三种物种的主要社会呼唤中,信息编码中的物种差异通常在多物种群中发生。山雀和山雀是“核”种,五子雀是“卫星”种,这些不同的作用可能与我们检测到的语音信号的差异有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号