首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Adoption and cuckoldry lead to alloparental care in the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), a non-group-living species with no evidence of nest site limitation
【24h】

Adoption and cuckoldry lead to alloparental care in the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), a non-group-living species with no evidence of nest site limitation

机译:领养和戴绿帽衫可导致镶嵌无的飞镖(Etheostoma olmstedi)成为异族育儿,这是一种非群体性物种,没有巢位限制的证据。

获取原文
           

摘要

While extensive empirical and theoretical work has focused on the evolution of costly cooperation (particularly in group-living species), less attention has been paid to more low-risk or immediately beneficial forms of cooperation. In some non-group-living darters, alloparental care (or allocare) by subordinates has been noted to result from by-product benefits as small territorial (subordinate) males adopt and provide care to the abandoned eggs of large territorial (dominant) males. In the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), allocare also results from sneak fertilization. However, information on the rate of allocare by tessellated darters is contradictory: prior behavioral work suggested that it is very common, while a genetic examination showed males to primarily care for their own young. We found behavioral and genetic evidence of very high levels of allocare at our study location. The relative size of the assigned fathers of young to the alloparental male is consistent with the idea that initial allocare primarily results from sneak fertilization (“cuckoldry-based allocare”), but later allocare results from subordinate males caring at previously abandoned nests (“adoption-based allocare”). Larger males appeared to breed more frequently at different nests, but did not father more individual offspring than smaller males. Finally, low relatedness between abandoning and alloparenting males suggests that kin selection does not contribute to alloparental care. We discuss how variation in nest availability may explain the inconsistent findings of the rate of alloparental care in the tessellated darter, and how increased research in this and similar systems can expand our understanding of the evolution of cooperation.
机译:尽管大量的经验和理论工作都集中在代价高昂的合作(特别是在集体生活物种中)的发展上,但对低风险或直接有益的合作形式的关注却较少。在一些非集体生活的突袭者中,下属的同种父母照料(或分配)被认为是副产品带来的好处,因为小型领地(下属)的雄性采用并提供照料,以照顾大型领地(显性)雄性的卵。在镶嵌飞镖(Etheostoma olmstedi)中,分配也来自偷偷施肥。但是,关于棋盘状飞镖分配率的信息是相互矛盾的:先前的行为工作表明这很普遍,而基因检查表明,男性主要照顾自己的年幼。我们在研究地点发现了分配水平很高的行为和遗传证据。分配给年轻的父亲与同父母的男性的相对大小与以下观点一致:最初的分配主要是由偷偷施肥导致的(“基于套间的分配”),但后来的分配是由照料先前被遗弃的巢穴的从属雄性引起的(“领养”)。 -based allocare”)。较大的雄性在不同的巢中繁殖的频率似乎更高,但是与较小的雄性相比,父亲的个体后代并不多。最后,被遗弃的男性和同父母的男性之间的低亲缘关系表明,亲属选择对同父母的照护没有帮助。我们讨论了巢可利用性的变化如何解释镶嵌镶嵌飞镖中同种异体父母护理率的不一致发现,以及在此系统和类似系统中进行的更多研究如何扩展我们对合作演变的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号