...
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation Week & Space Technology >Chinese Have Wrong Expertise For C919
【24h】

Chinese Have Wrong Expertise For C919

机译:中国人对C919的专业知识有误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am sometimes amazed by all the optimism of the dozens of Western aerospace executives shuttling in and out of the Comac (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China) headquarters in Shanghai. Most have not made a dime yet on the business, but they continue to send dozens of engineers to China, invest millions to form joint ventures with Chinese aerospace companies, and diligently educate the Chinese on the basics of commercial aircraft-building, hoping one day that these costly efforts will turn into big money. Unfortunately, I do not share the same sentiment. I see little chance that Comac will get its mid-range commercial aircraft, the C919, off the ground. My skepticism comes from Comae's methods in designing and building the C919. First, it is using engineers, mid-level managers and executives who have virtually no commercial aircraft experience. Second, it is outsourcing almost everything: parts, systems, subsystems and testing.
机译:有时候,数十名西方航空高管进出上海的中国商飞公司(中国商用飞机总公司)总部感到乐观。大多数人在业务上还没有赚到一毛钱,但他们继续派遣数十名工程师到中国,投资数百万美元与中国航空航天公司组建合资企业,并努力地向中国人学习商用飞机制造的基础知识,希望有一天这些昂贵的努力将变成一笔巨款。不幸的是,我不同意。我认为Comac不太可能将其中型商用飞机C919推离地面。我的怀疑来自Comae设计和制造C919的方法。首先,它使用的是几乎没有商用飞机经验的工程师,中层管理人员和执行人员。其次,它几乎将所有东西都外包:零件,系统,子系统和测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号