...
首页> 外文期刊>Automotive recycling >Directors and Officers Liability for Privately Held-Companies
【24h】

Directors and Officers Liability for Privately Held-Companies

机译:私营公司的董事和高级职员责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A common perception of private company owners is that they do not need to purchase Directors and Officers liability coverage. This is due to the fact that most lawsuits involving private D&O are quietly settled and are not splashed across the front page of the Wall Street Journal like many of the claims brought against public companies. However, private companies are often sued for events that are not covered by general liability, employment practices, or fiduciary liability policies. Further, it is often the case that employment practices liability insurance (EPO) is often confused with D&O as well as employee benefits liability E&O.
机译:私营公司所有者的普遍看法是,他们不需要购买董事和高级职员的责任险。这是由于这样一个事实,即大多数涉及私人D&O的诉讼都已得到了和解,没有像对上市公司提出的许多要求那样,在《华尔街日报》的首页上大肆宣传。但是,私人公司经常因一般责任,雇佣惯例或信托责任政策未涵盖的事件而被起诉。此外,通常情况下,雇佣惯例责任保险(EPO)通常与D&O和员工福利责任E&O混淆。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Automotive recycling》 |2015年第3期|14-14|共1页
  • 作者

    Bill Velin;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号