首页> 外文期刊>Australian Planner >Crime prevention through environmental design: a case study of multi-agency collaborationin Sydney, Australia
【24h】

Crime prevention through environmental design: a case study of multi-agency collaborationin Sydney, Australia

机译:通过环境设计预防犯罪:澳大利亚悉尼市多机构合作案例研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) has been legislated in every State and Territory of Australia despite the lack of clear empirical evidence that it is successful (Homel, 2005). Despite a commitment in the literature surrounding CPTED to isolate ‘what works’ (Cherney and Sutton, 2007), there is a distinct lack of empirical evidence in Australia that details how CPTED theory operates in practice. To address this gap in the existing literature, this paper presents the findings of a case study that was conducted on Martin Place, a major pedestrian thoroughfare located in Sydney, Australia. Following on from the research conducted by Zahm (2005) that explored the transference of CPTED knowledge from criminologists to those involved with the design of public places, this paper analyses how CPTED theory was understood and utilised as part of the multi-agency implementation of CPTED-based initiatives that occur in Martin Place. Furthermore, this paper presents a brief history of the development of CPTED in New South Wales (NSW), and a unique framework for understanding the application of CPTED within these contexts. With the help of this case study, this paper addresses the absence of research and evaluation of how CPTED has been implemented in Australia.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCPTED, crime prevention, criminologyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2011.608689
机译:尽管缺乏明确的经验证据证明,通过环境设计预防犯罪(CPTED)在澳大利亚每个州和领地都得到了立法(Homel,2005年)。尽管围绕CPTED的文献中承诺要分离出“什么起作用”(Cherney和Sutton,2007),但澳大利亚仍然缺乏经验证据,详细说明了CPTED理论在实践中的运作方式。为了解决现有文献中的这一空白,本文介绍了在澳大利亚悉尼的主要行人通道Martin Place进行的案例研究的结果。 Zahm(2005)进行的研究探讨了犯罪专家向公共场所设计人员转移CPTED知识的过程,本文分析了如何将CPTED理论理解和利用为CPTED多机构实施的一部分马丁广场发生的基于计划的计划。此外,本文介绍了CPTED在新南威尔士州(NSW)的发展的简要历史,以及了解CPTED在这些情况下的应用的独特框架。在这个案例研究的帮助下,本文解决了缺乏有关CPTED在澳大利亚实施的研究和评估的问题。查看全文下载全文关键字CPTED,预防犯罪,犯罪学::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2011.608689

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号