首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs >Looking to the long-term for management of tropical tunas? An assessment of special requirements arguments at WCPFC14
【24h】

Looking to the long-term for management of tropical tunas? An assessment of special requirements arguments at WCPFC14

机译:希望对热带金枪鱼进行长期管理?在WCPFC14上对特殊要求论证的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 14th Session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) convened in Manila, Philippines from 3 to 8 December 2017. At the meeting, Commission members adopted eight legally binding measures for the purposes of conserving and managing tuna and tuna-like species in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Closing at three am on the longest day of negotiations in WCPFC history, the session advanced complex negotiations on a bridging measure to regulate the region's three highly valuable tropical tuna stocks. A key factor in the meeting's late close was the negotiating positions taken by three member countries to alter the measure based on claims concerning their special requirements. Subsequent debate revealed that the Commission currently lacks a systematic approach to addressing the special requirements of its member countries. Furthermore, negotiations showed the extent to which members leverage ambiguity concerning special requirements in order to broker compromises within the Commission's ad-hoc, short-term decision-making framework. Outcomes from WCPFC14 demonstrate that while Commission members have made long-term promises to evolve their approach to decision-making through tools like harvest strategies and an allocation framework, at the session itself they continued to rely on short-term decision-making that did not reflect scientifically advised limits.
机译:2017年12月3日至8日在菲律宾马尼拉召开了中西部太平洋渔业委员会(WCPFC)第十四届会议。在会议上,委员会成员通过了八项具有法律约束力的措施,以保护和管理金枪鱼和类似金枪鱼的物种在西太平洋和中太平洋。在WCPFC历史上最长的谈判一天上午三点闭幕,本届会议推进了一项复杂的谈判,以一种过渡性措施来规范该地区的三只极有价值的热带金枪鱼种群。会议闭幕的一个关键因素是三个成员国根据有关其特殊要求的主张采取的改变措施的谈判立场。随后的辩论表明,委员会目前缺乏解决其成员国特殊要求的系统方法。此外,谈判表明,成员国在多大程度上利用了对特殊要求的含糊不清,以便在委员会的临时临时决策框架内促成折衷方案。 WCPFC14的结果表明,尽管委员会成员作出了长期承诺,将通过诸如收获战略和分配框架之类的工具来发展其决策方法,但在本届会议上,他们继续依靠短期决策,而这些决策并没有反映科学建议的限制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs》 |2018年第3期|195-204|共10页
  • 作者

    Angela Abolhassani;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), Centre for Marine Socioecology (CMS), Hobart, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号