首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Management >Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies
【24h】

Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies

机译:所有权结构和自愿披露:实证研究的综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this article, we meta-analyse 69 empirical studies assessing the association between corporate voluntary disclosure and ownership concentration and types, and how institutional characteristics and research design moderate these relationships. Our overall analyses show that state, foreign and institutional ownerships have a positive effect but managerial ownership and ownership concentration have a negative effect on voluntary disclosure. Since the overall effect may conceal the underlying factors that cause heterogeneity in the effect size distribution, we select two important institutional factors: country-level investor protection and the equity market development, and research design and journal quality, to explain the mixed and conflicting findings. Our results emphasise the need to consider legal and institutional characteristics, and researcher induced-artefacts, in understanding the role of ownership structure and identity in corporate voluntary disclosure.
机译:在本文中,我们对69项实证研究进行荟萃分析,评估了公司自愿披露与所有权集中度和类型之间的关联,以及机构特征和研究设计如何缓和这些关系。我们的总体分析表明,国家,外国和机构所有权对自愿披露有积极影响,但管理所有权和所有权集中度却有不利影响。由于总体效应可能掩盖了造成效应规模分布异质性的潜在因素,因此,我们选择两个重要的制度性因素:国家层面的投资者保护和股票市场发展,以及研究设计和期刊质量,以解释混杂和矛盾的结果。我们的结果强调,在理解所有权结构和身份在公司自愿披露中的作用时,需要考虑法律和制度特征以及研究人员的人工制品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号