首页> 外文期刊>Australian intellectual property journal >Appropriation in the name of art: Is a quotation exception the answer?
【24h】

Appropriation in the name of art: Is a quotation exception the answer?

机译:以艺术的名义挪用:报价例外是答案吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Australian Law Reform Commission is at present considering the scope of exceptions to copyright infringement. Its consideration will no doubt be influenced to some degree by the outcome in EMI Songs Australia Pty Ltd v Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd (2011) 191 FCR 444; (2011) 90 IPR 50 which concerned the quotation of a musical phrase in a later musical work. This article addresses the problem of creative appropriations and the extent to which a quotation exception, consistent with Art 10 of the Berne Convention, should be incorporated into Australian law. In doing so it considers the practical application of such a quotation exception in European jurisdictions (most notably Germany) and suggests the form in which such an exception might be incorporated into Australian law.
机译:澳大利亚法律改革委员会目前正在考虑版权侵权例外的范围。毫无疑问,EMI Songs Australia Pty Ltd诉Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd(2011)191 FCR 444一案的结果将在一定程度上影响其考虑。 (2011)90 IPR 50,涉及后来的音乐作品中音乐短语的引用。本文讨论了创意拨款的问题,以及在何种程度上应将与《伯尔尼公约》第10条相一致的报价例外纳入澳大利亚法律。在这样做时,它考虑了在欧洲管辖区(最著名的是德国)中这种报价例外的实际应用,并提出了可以将这种例外纳入澳大利亚法律的形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号