首页> 外文期刊>Australian Environment Review >EPA chooses the levy for the bury but the levy's awry: Maddingley Brown Coal v Environment Protection Authority
【24h】

EPA chooses the levy for the bury but the levy's awry: Maddingley Brown Coal v Environment Protection Authority

机译:EPA选择对埋葬处征税,但征税意见不对:Maddingley Brown Coal v环境保护局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The outcome in this case depended on the particular and unusual factual scenario that arose and, of course, the regulatory regime. In particular, the self-regulation approach adopted by the EPA led to the dispute regarding the application and extent of the DBR exemption. However, there are important lessons to be learnt -for regulators and taxpayers. For regulators: 1. procedures for amending and varying exemptions and making other decisions must be followed; 2. retrospective policy documents (and even policy documents issued before the making of regulations) are likely to be of little assistance in interpreting the meaning of regulations and other legislative instruments - care should therefore be taken in drafting regulations and other legislative instruments; and 3. care should also be taken in drafting regulations and other legislative instruments (such as the Classification) to ensure that they are properly made, and within power.
机译:在这种情况下,结果取决于出现的特殊和不寻常的事实情况,当然还取决于监管制度。尤其是,美国环保署(EPA)采取的自我调节方法导致了关于免税DBR的适用范围和范围的争议。但是,对于监管者和纳税人来说,还有很多重要的经验教训。对于监管机构:1.必须遵循修改和变更豁免以及做出其他决定的程序; 2.回顾性政策文件(甚至法规制定之前发布的政策文件)在解释法规和其他立法工具的含义方面可能几乎没有帮助-因此在起草法规和其他立法工具时应格外小心; 3.在起草法规和其他法律文书(例如分类法)时也应谨慎,以确保其正确制定并在职权范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号