...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine >A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model
【24h】

A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model

机译:仿真研究将动态对比增强MRI的9种动脉输入函数数学模型与Parker模型进行了比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to large inter- and intra-patient variabilities of arterial input functions (AIFs), accurately modeling and using patient-specific AIF are very important for quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Computer simulations were performed to evaluate and compare nine population AIF models with the Parker AIF used as ‘gold standard’. The Parker AIF was calculated with a temporal resolution of 1.5 s, and then the other nine AIF models were used to fit the Parker AIF. A total of 100 randomly generated volume transfer constants (K_(trans)) and distribution volumes (v~(e)) were used to calculate the contrast agent concentration curves based on the Parker AIF and the extended Tofts model with blood plasma volume (v~(p)) = 0.0, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10. Subsequently, nine AIF models were used to fit these curves to extract physiological parameters (K_(trans), v~(e)and v~(p)). The agreements between generated and extracted K_(trans)and v~(e)values were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis. The effects of the second pass of the Parker AIF model with and without adding Rician noise on extracted physiological parameters were evaluated by 1000 simulations using one of the nine mathematical AIF models closest to the Parker model with the smallest number of parameters. The results demonstrated that a six-parameter linear function plus bi-exponential function AIF model was almost equivalent to the Parker AIF and that the corresponding generated and extracted K_(trans)and v~(e)were in excellent agreements. The effects of the second pass of contrast agent circulation were small on extracted physiological parameters using the extended Tofts model, unless noise was added with signal to noise ratio less than 10 dB.
机译:由于患者之间和患者内部动脉输入功能(AIF)的差异很大,因此准确地建模和使用患者特定的AIF对于动态对比增强MRI的定量分析非常重要。进行了计算机模拟,以评估和比较九种人口AIF模型,并将帕克AIF用作“黄金标准”。计算派克AIF的时间分辨率为1.5秒,然后使用其他九种AIF模型拟合派克AIF。根据Parker AIF和具有血浆体积(v的扩展Tofts模型),总共使用100个随机生成的体积转移常数(K_(trans))和分布体积(v〜(e))来计算造影剂浓度曲线。 〜(p))= 0.0、0.01、0.05和0.10。随后,使用九个AIF模型拟合这些曲线以提取生理参数(K_(trans),v〜(e)和v〜(p))。使用Bland–Altman分析评估生成和提取的K_(trans)和v〜(e)值之间的一致性。通过使用最接近参数数量最少的Parker模型的九个数学AIF模型之一,通过1000次仿真,评估了添加和不添加Rician噪声的Parker AIF模型第二次通过对提取的生理参数的影响。结果表明,六参数线性函数加双指数函数AIF模型几乎与Parker AIF等效,并且相应的生成和提取的K_(trans)和v〜(e)具有良好的一致性。使用扩展的Tofts模型,第二次造影剂循环通过对提取的生理参数的影响很小,除非添加噪声且信噪比小于10 dB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号